This one is not strictly a problem, but a thing that I encountered by accident. However, it is really intriguing to me.
I've run the following line in my console
sc_matrix <- data.frame(sc_start<-rpois(n=15, 0.4), sc_end<-rpois(n=15, 0.3))
and I was really surprised that the output was
head(sc_matrix, n=5)
# sc_start....rpois.n...15..0.4. sc_end....rpois.n...15..0.3.
#1 0 1
#2 0 2
#3 0 0
#4 1 1
#5 0 0
First, I was surprised because the interpreter understood me (without even a warning). The data.frame was created even though I have used <- assignment inside of the data.frame constructor.
Second, the colnames seems to be created according to the rule change all non-alpha-numeric into .(dot) and use it as a name.
After reading the discussion on assignments comparison I guess my question is:
How R handles that line of code? Since there is no = operator it evaluates each argument, e.g. sc_start<-rpois(n=15, 0.4), creates column name from it and uses the value of the right-side evaluation?
It seems tricky, since the operator <- does not return any value and I would guess the created data.frame should contain something like NULL.
I will appreciate any comments on this.
sc_matrix <- data.frame(sc_start<-rpois(n=15, 0.4), sc_end<-rpois(n=15, 0.3))
To understand what happens here, you need to know that like almost everything in R (except data objects) <- is actually a function. You can even do things like `<-`(a, 1). This function has an invisible return value, which is the RHS of the assignment (see help("<-")), i.e., your assumption is wrong.
If you don't pass column names to data.frame (as the LHS of =) it uses substitute to create names. These names are sanitized if check.names = TRUE, the default. What you observe is essentially the same as if you do something like data.frame(1).