So what I am trying to accomplish is to add ActionListener to a button which is defined in another class, without breaking encapsulation of this button.
My GUI class:
public class GUI extends JFrame {
private JButton button;
public GUI () {
this.button = new JButton ();
}
public void setText (Text text) {
this.button.setText (text);
}
public JButton getButton () {
return this.button;
}
}
My Game class:
public class Game {
private GUI gui;
public Game () {
this.gui = new GUI ();
this.gui.getButton ().addActionListener (new ActionListener () {
public void actionPerformed (ActionEvent evt) {
play ();
}
});
}
public void play () {
this.gui.setText ("Play");
}
}
Then I call a new Game instance in the Main class.
I would like to get rid of the getter in GUI class, otherwise there is no point in using text setter or setters similar to that.
When I add ActionListener to GUI constructor, I have no access to Game methods than. Is there a solution that I don't see?
Let the GUI
add the action listener to the button, let the Game
create the action listener:
public class GUI extends JFrame {
public void addActionListenerToButton(ActionListener listener) {
button.addActionListener(listener);
}
....
}
public class Game {
private GUI gui;
public Game () {
this.gui = new GUI ();
this.gui.addActionListenerToButton (new ActionListener () {
public void actionPerformed (ActionEvent evt) {
play ();
}
});
}
...
}
Alternatively just pass in a functional interface instead of a fully built ActionListener
.