I'm running an application which builds and sends ICMP ECHO requests to a few different ip addresses. The application is written in Crystal. When attempting to open a socket from within the crystal docker container, Crystal raises an exception: Permission Denied.
From within the container, I have no problem running ping 8.8.8.8
.
Running the application on macos, I have no problem.
Reading the https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/apparmor/ and https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/seccomp/ pages on apparmor and seccomp I was sure I'd found the solution, but the problem remains unresolved, even when running as docker run --rm --security-opt seccomp=unconfined --security-opt apparmor=unconfined socket_permission
update/edit: After digging into capabilities(7)
, I added the following line to my dockerfile: RUN setcap cap_net_raw+ep bin/ping
trying to let the socket get opened but without change.
Thanks!
Relevant crystal socket code, full working code sample below:
# send request
address = Socket::IPAddress.new host, 0
socket = IPSocket.new Socket::Family::INET, Socket::Type::DGRAM, Socket::Protocol::ICMP
socket.send slice, to: address
Dockerfile:
FROM crystallang/crystal:0.23.1
WORKDIR /opt
COPY src/ping.cr src/
RUN mkdir bin
RUN crystal -v
RUN crystal build -o bin/ping src/ping.cr
ENTRYPOINT ["/bin/sh","-c"]
CMD ["/opt/bin/ping"]
Running the code, first native, then via docker:
#!/bin/bash
crystal run src/ping.cr
docker build -t socket_permission .
docker run --rm --security-opt seccomp=unconfined --security-opt apparmor=unconfined socket_permission
And finally, a 50 line crystal script which fails to open a socket in docker:
require "socket"
TYPE = 8_u16
IP_HEADER_SIZE_8 = 20
PACKET_LENGTH_8 = 16
PACKET_LENGTH_16 = 8
MESSAGE = " ICMP"
def ping
sequence = 0_u16
sender_id = 0_u16
host = "8.8.8.8"
# initialize packet with MESSAGE
packet = Array(UInt16).new PACKET_LENGTH_16 do |i|
MESSAGE[ i % MESSAGE.size ].ord.to_u16
end
# build out ICMP header
packet[0] = (TYPE.to_u16 << 8)
packet[1] = 0_u16
packet[2] = sender_id
packet[3] = sequence
# calculate checksum
checksum = 0_u32
packet.each do |byte|
checksum += byte
end
checksum += checksum >> 16
checksum = checksum ^ 0xffff_ffff_u32
packet[1] = checksum.to_u16
# convert packet to 8 bit words
slice = Bytes.new(PACKET_LENGTH_8)
eight_bit_packet = packet.map do |word|
[(word >> 8), (word & 0xff)]
end.flatten.map(&.to_u8)
eight_bit_packet.each_with_index do |chr, i|
slice[i] = chr
end
# send request
address = Socket::IPAddress.new host, 0
socket = IPSocket.new Socket::Family::INET, Socket::Type::DGRAM, Socket::Protocol::ICMP
socket.send slice, to: address
# receive response
buffer = Bytes.new(PACKET_LENGTH_8 + IP_HEADER_SIZE_8)
count, address = socket.receive buffer
length = buffer.size
icmp_data = buffer[IP_HEADER_SIZE_8, length-IP_HEADER_SIZE_8]
end
ping
It turns out the answer is that Linux (and by extension docker) does not give the same permissions that macOS does for DGRAM sockets. Changing the socket declaration to socket = IPSocket.new Socket::Family::INET, Socket::Type::RAW, Socket::Protocol::ICMP
allows the socket to connect under docker.
A little more still is required to run the program in a non-root context. Because raw sockets are restricted to root, the binary must also be issued the correct capability for access to a raw socket, CAP_NET_RAW
. However, in docker, this isn't necessary. I was able to get the program to run outside of super-user context by running sudo setcap cap_net_raw+ep bin/ping
. This is a decent primer on capabilities and the setpcap command
MacOS doesn't use the same system of permissions, so setcap
is just an unrecognized command. As a result, to get the above code to compile and run successfully on macOS without super-user context, I changed the socket creation code to:
socket_type = Socket::Type::RAW
{% if flag?(:darwin) %}
socket_type = Socket::Type::DGRAM
{% end %}
socket = IPSocket.new Socket::Family::INET, socket_type, Socket::Protocol::ICMP
Applying the CAP_NET_RAW
capability for use in linux happens elsewhere in the build process if needed.
With those changes, I'm not seeing any requirement for changes to seccomp or apparmor from the default shipped with Docker in order to run the program.