This throws an error in Perl v5.20:
use strict;
use warnings;
my @a = (2,3,9);
my %b = map { "number $_" => 2*$_ } @a;
Error:
syntax error at a.pl line 4, near "} @a"
Execution of a.pl aborted due to compilation errors.
This doesn't:
use strict;
use warnings;
my @a = (2,3,9);
my %b = map { "number ".$_ => 2*$_ } @a;
Why is interpolation of $_
disallowed within the map
BLOCK?
map
has two syntax:
map BLOCK LIST
map EXPR, LIST
Perl must determine which syntax you are using. The problem is that both BLOCK
and EXPR
can start with {
because { ... }
can be the hash constructor (e.g. my $h = { a => 1, b => 2 };
).
That means that Perl's grammar is ambiguous. When an ambiguity is encountered, perl
guesses what you mean after looking ahead a little. In your situation, it guessed wrong. It guessed {
was the start of a hash constructor instead of the start of a block. You will need to disambiguate explicitly.
The following are convenient ways to disambiguate blocks and hash constructors:
+{ ... } # Not a valid block, so must be a hash constructor.
{; ... } # Perl looks head, and sees that this must be a block.
So in your case, you could use
my %b = map {; "number $_" => 2*$_ } @a;
Related: Difference between returning +{} or {} in perl from a function, and return ref or value