if I have a file foo.lua:
local foo = {}
foo.add = function(a, b) return a+b end
foo.sub = function(a, b) return a-b end
foo.multiply = function(a, b) return a*b end
return foo
and in bar.lua I make heavy use of code from foo.lua I am bothered by typing foo.add() all the time and would prefer to write just add() in bar.lua I can add this:
local foo = require('foo')
local add, sub, multiply = foo.add, foo.sub, foo.multiply
but that begins to be a pain when you are including aliasing many values from many files. In c++ there is a way around this:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std
In lua I was thinking you could emulate this feature like so:
local foo = require('foo')
setmetatable(_ENV, {__index = foo})
from what I can tell it respects scope so thing like the code below play nice:
actually the code below does not work. I was running the code through the lua repl. When I wrote the code snippet below in a lua file it did not have give the desired result.
f = function() -- returns 2
setmetatable(_ENV, {__index = foo})
return add(1, 1)
end
add(1, 1) -- returns 2
is there any reason I might regret doing this? (other than reasons that also appy to using namespace)
Changing the global environment is not polite to other libraries.
Try the other way around:
do
local _ENV = setmetatable(foo, {index = _ENV})
print(add(1, 1))
end
Note that add will be resolved in foo and print in the original _ENV.