I need a bit of assistance with this shorthand condition. My attempt at it so far is becoming a bit of a challenge and cant seem to make it more readable. I believe it was short circuited from minifying.
if (a === !0 || perSearch.rates.fy2) {
e();
} else if ( perSearch.rates.fy1.multiple || perSearch.rates.fy2.multiple ){
calculateRates();
} else {
perSearch.rates.fy1.multiple;
}
From this terse expression:
a === !0 || (perSearch.rates.fy2 ? perSearch.rates.fy1.multiple || perSearch.rates.fy2.multiple ? e() : calculateRates() : perSearch.rates.fy1.multiple ? e() : calculateRates())
Your expression corresponds to
if (a === !0) {
} else {
if (perSearch.rates.fy2) {
if (perSearch.rates.fy1.multiple || perSearch.rates.fy2.multiple) {
e();
} else {
calculateRates();
}
} else {
if (perSearch.rates.fy1.multiple) {
e();
} else {
calculateRates();
}
}
}
which can be simplified to
if (a !== true) {
if (perSearch.rates.fy1.multiple || (perSearch.rates.fy2 && perSearch.rates.fy2.multiple)) {
e();
} else {
calculateRates();
}
}