I have an orders
collection with the following index, among others:
{location: 1, completedDate: 1, estimatedProductionDate: 1, estimatedCompletionDate: 1}
I'm performing the following query:
db.orders.find({
status: {$in: [1, 2, 3]},
location: "PA",
$or: [
{completedDate: {$lt: ISODate("2017-08-22T04:59:59.999Z")}},
{
completedDate: null,
estimatedProductionDate: {$lt: ISODate("2017-08-22T04:59:59.999Z")}
}
]
}).explain()
I was hoping this would perform an efficient IXSCAN
for each branch of the $or
, and then combine the results:
{completedDate: {$lt: ISODate("2017-08-22T04:59:59.999Z")}}
"indexBounds" : {
"location" : [
"[\"TX\", \"TX\"]"
],
"completedDate" : [
"[MinKey, ISODate("2017-08-22T04:59:59.999Z")]"
],
"estimatedProductionDate" : [
"[MinKey, MaxKey]"
],
"estimatedCompletionDate" : [
"[MinKey, MaxKey]"
]
}
{
completedDate: null,
estimatedProductionDate: {$lt: ISODate("2017-08-22T04:59:59.999Z")}
}
"indexBounds" : {
"location" : [
"[\"TX\", \"TX\"]"
],
"completedDate" : [
"[null, null]"
],
"estimatedProductionDate" : [
"[MinKey, ISODate("2017-08-22T04:59:59.999Z")]"
],
"estimatedCompletionDate" : [
"[MinKey, MaxKey]"
]
}
Instead, it only bounds the location
in the IXSCAN
, and does the rest of the filtering during FETCH
. Is there any way to optimize this query without splitting it into two separate queries?
"winningPlan" : {
"stage" : "FETCH",
"filter" : {
"$and" : [
{
"$or" : [
{
"$and" : [
{
"completedDate" : {
"$eq" : null
}
},
{
"estimatedProductionDate" : {
"$lt" : "2017-08-22T04:59:59.999Z"
}
}
]
},
{
"completedDate" : {
"$lt" : "2017-08-22T04:59:59.999Z"
}
}
]
},
{
"status" : {
"$in" : [
1,
2,
3
]
}
}
]
},
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN",
"keyPattern" : {
"location" : 1,
"completedDate" : 1,
"estimatedProductionDate" : 1,
"estimatedCompletionDate" : 1
},
"indexName" : "location_1_completedDate_1_estimatedProductionDate_1_estimatedCompletionDate_1",
"isMultiKey" : false,
"isUnique" : false,
"isSparse" : false,
"isPartial" : false,
"indexVersion" : 1,
"direction" : "forward",
"indexBounds" : {
"location" : [
"[\"TX\", \"TX\"]"
],
"completedDate" : [
"[MinKey, MaxKey]"
],
"estimatedProductionDate" : [
"[MinKey, MaxKey]"
],
"estimatedCompletionDate" : [
"[MinKey, MaxKey]"
]
}
}
},
There are three issues that are immediately apparent:
I'm not sure about the other indexes you have, but your query is of the shape:
{
status:1,
location:1,
$or: [
{completedDate:1},
{completedDate:1, estimatedProductionDate:1}
]
}
However your index does not contain the term status
. You would need the status
field in your index to maximize index use.
To paraphrase the page $or Clauses and Indexes:
... for MongoDB to use indexes to evaluate an $or expression, all the clauses in the $or expression must be supported by indexes. Otherwise, MongoDB will perform a collection scan.
To put it simply, efficient $or
queries in MongoDB would require the $or
term to be the top-level term, with each part of the term supported by an index.
For example, you may find the performance of the following index and query to be a bit better:
db.orders.createIndex({
status:1,
location:1,
completedDate:1,
estimatedProductionDate:1
})
db.orders.explain().find({
$or: [
{
status: {$in: [1, 2, 3]},
location: "PA",
completedDate: {$lt: ISODate("2017-08-22T04:59:59.999Z")}},
{
status: {$in: [1, 2, 3]},
location: "PA",
completedDate: null,
estimatedProductionDate: {$lt: ISODate("2017-08-22T04:59:59.999Z")}
}
]
})
The reason is because MongoDB treats each of the term in an $or
query to be a separate query. Thus, each term can use its own index.
Note that the order of fields in the index I proposed above follows the order of the fields in the query.
However, this is still not optimal, because MongoDB has to perform a fetch with filter: {completedDate: {$eq: null}}
after the index scan for a query with completedDate: null
. The reason for this is subtle and best explained here:
- The document {} generates the index key {"": null} for the index with key pattern {"a.b": 1}.
- The document {a: []} also generates the index key {"": null} for the index with key pattern {"a.b": 1}.
- The document {} matches the query {"a.b": null}.
- The document {a: []} does not match the query {"a.b": null}.
Therefore, a query {"a.b": null} that is answered by an index with key pattern {"a.b": 1} must fetch the document and re-check the predicate, in order to ensure that the document {} is included in the result set and that the document {a: []} is not included in the result set.
To maximize index use, you may be better off just to assign something into the completedDate
field instead of setting it to null
.