Using R to predict the next values in a series.
The following code generates and plots a model for a curve with some uniform noise:
slope = 0.55
offset = -0.5
amplitude = 0.22
frequency = 3
noise = 0.75
x <- seq( 0, 200 )
y <- offset + (slope * x / 100) + (amplitude * sin( frequency * x / 100 ))
yn <- y + (noise * runif( length( x ) ))
gam.object <- gam( yn ~ s( x ) + 0 )
plot( gam.object, col = rgb( 1.0, 0.392, 0.0 ) )
points( x, yn, col = rgb( 0.121, 0.247, 0.506 ) )
The model reveals the trend, as expected. The trouble is predicting subsequent values:
p <- predict( gam.object, data.frame( x=201:210 ) )
The predictions do not look correct when plotted:
df <- data.frame( fit=c( fitted( gam.object ), p ) )
plot( seq( 1:211 ), df[,], col="blue" )
points( yn, col="orange" )
The predicted values (from 201 onwards) appear to be too low.
fitted.values( gam.object )
and p
)?y
are greater than 0. (runif
creates numbers on [0,1]
, not [-1,1]
.)For example:
gam.object2 <- gam( yn ~ s( x ))
p2 <- predict( gam.object2, data.frame( x=201:210 ))
points( 1:211, c( fitted( gam.object2 ), p2), col="green")
The reason for the systematic underestimation in the model without intercept could be that gam
uses a sum-to-zero constraint on the estimated smooth functions. I think point 2 answers your first and second questions.
Your third question needs clarification because a gam
-object is not a data.frame
. The two data types do not mix.
A more complete example:
slope = 0.55
amplitude = 0.22
frequency = 3
noise = 0.75
x <- 1:200
y <- (slope * x / 100) + (amplitude * sin( frequency * x / 100 ))
ynoise <- y + (noise * runif( length( x ) ))
gam.object <- gam( ynoise ~ s( x ) )
p <- predict( gam.object, data.frame( x = 1:210 ) )
plot( p, col = rgb( 0, 0.75, 0.2 ) )
points( x, ynoise, col = rgb( 0.121, 0.247, 0.506 ) )
points( fitted( gam.object ), col = rgb( 1.0, 0.392, 0.0 ) )