When to use forEach(_:) instead of for in?

Question

As documented in both Array and Dictionary forEach(_:) Instance methods:

Calls the given closure on each element in the sequence in the same order as a for-in loop.

Nevertheless, adapted from Sequence Overview:

A sequence is a list of values that you can step through one at a time. The most common way to iterate over the elements of a sequence is to use a for-in loop.

Implying that iterating sequence by forEach(_:) or for in:

let closedRange = 1...3

for element in closedRange { print(element) } // 1 2 3

closedRange.forEach { print($0) } // 1 2 3

Or (Array):

let array = [1, 2, 3]

for element in array { print(element) } // 1 2 3

array.forEach { print($0) } // 1 2 3

Would gives the same output.

Why forEach(_:) even exist? i.e what is the benefit of using it instead of the for in loop? would they be the same from performance point view?

As an assumption, it could be a syntactic sugar especially when working with functional programming.

Answer 1

There is no performance benefit offered by forEach. In fact, if you look at the source code, the forEach function actually simply performing for-in. For release builds, the performance overhead of this function over simply using for-in yourself is immaterial, though for debug builds, it results in a negligible (but observable) performance impact.

The main advantage of forEach is realized when you are doing functional programming, you can add it to a chain of functional calls, without having to save the prior result into a separate variable that you'd need if you used for-in syntax. So, instead of:

let objects = array.map { … }
    .filter { … }

for object in objects {
    …
}

You can instead stay within functional programming patterns:

array.map { … }
    .filter { … }
    .forEach { … }

The result is functional code that is more concise and with less syntactic noise.

FWIW, the documentation for Array, Dictionary, and Sequence all remind us of the limitations introduced by forEach, namely:

1. You cannot use a break or continue statement to exit the current call of the body closure or skip subsequent calls.

2. Using the return statement in the body closure will exit only from the current call to body, not from any outer scope, and won't skip subsequent calls.