I have two data frames, first on is my predicted values in range format:
structure(c("(-3,2]", "(2,7]", "(-3,2]", "(2,7]", "(-3,2]",
"(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]",
"(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]",
"(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(2,7]"), .Dim = c(5L,
5L), .Dimnames = list(NULL, c("Q", "Y", "S", "L", "X")))
and other one is the reference values:
structure(c("(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]",
"(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]",
"(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]",
"(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]", "(-3,2]"), .Dim = c(5L,
5L), .Dimnames = list(NULL, c("Q", "Y", "S", "L", "X")))
I have tried couple of ways, but I could not figure out how to perform a confusion matrix. Can anyone please help me? Thanks!
There cannot be much "confusion" if all the values of one of the objects are all the same but here's code that should work for a more complete listing:
table(unlist(dat2),unlist(dat1))
(-3,2] (2,7]
(-3,2] 22 3
With your earlier print
-ed data I got:
table(unlist(dat2),unlist(dat1))
(-3,2] (2,7]
(-3,2] 21 0
(2,7] 2 2
If they had been factors you might not have succeeded. Might have needed to run lapply
using as.character
to coerce to "character".