NUnit has the following feature where you can specify different values for a test with a TestCase attribute. Does Catch has something similar?
[TestCase(12,3,4)]
[TestCase(12,2,6)]
[TestCase(12,4,3)]
public void DivideTest(int n, int d, int q)
{
Assert.AreEqual( q, n / d );
}
I need to run the same unit test with different data values but each be different unit tests. I can copy/paste TEST_CASE/SECTION and change values but is there a clean way to do it like NUnit does.
I'm finding it really hard to even figure out what to search for. Catch uses TEST_CASE for a unit test which is completely different than what NUnit calls TestCase.
I could not quite find the equivalent of what you are looking for, but you are not required to copy and paste everything at all:
#include "catch.hpp"
// A test function which we are going to call in the test cases
void testDivision(int n, int d, int q)
{
// we intend to run this multiple times and count the errors independently
// so we use CHECK rather than REQUIRE
CHECK( q == n / d );
}
TEST_CASE( "Divisions with sections", "[divide]" ) {
// This is more cumbersome but it will work better
// if we need to use REQUIRE in our test function
SECTION("by three") {
testDivision(12, 3, 4);
}
SECTION("by four") {
testDivision(12, 4, 3);
}
SECTION("by two") {
testDivision(12, 2, 7); // wrong!
}
SECTION("by six") {
testDivision(12, 6, 2);
}
}
TEST_CASE( "Division without Sections", "[divide]" ) {
testDivision(12, 3, 4);
testDivision(12, 4, 3);
testDivision(12, 2, 7); // oops...
testDivision(12, 6, 2); // this would not execute because
// of previous failing REQUIRE had we used that
}
TEST_CASE ("Division with loop", "[divide]")
{
struct {
int n;
int d;
int q;
} test_cases[] = {{12,3,4}, {12,4,3}, {12,2,7},
{12,6,2}};
for(auto &test_case : test_cases) {
testDivision(test_case.n, test_case.d, test_case.q);
}
}