Search code examples
c++c++17stdoptional

How do I use std::optional in C++?


I am trying to use std::optional but my code raise error.
I have specified #include <experimental/optional> and compiler options are -std=c++1z, -lc++experimental.

How to use std::experimental::optional?

The following is code:

#include <experimental/optional>
#include <iostream>

std::experimental::optional<int> my_div(int x, int y) {
    if (y != 0) {
        int b = x / y;
        return {b};
    }
    else {
        return {};
    }
}

int main() {
    auto res = my_div(6, 2);
    if (res) {
        int p = res.value();
        std::cout << p << std::endl;
    }
}

error message:

optional.cpp:17:21: error: call to unavailable member function 'value': 
        int p = res.value();
                ~~~~^~~~~
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/experimental/optional:525:17: note: candidate function has been explicitly made unavailable
    value_type& value()
                ^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/experimental/optional:517:33: note: candidate function has been explicitly made unavailable
    constexpr value_type const& value() const
                                ^
1 error generated.

OS: macOS 10.12.5

Compiler version:

Apple LLVM version 8.1.0 (clang-802.0.42)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin16.6.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin

Solution

  • Okay, after you posted your error, I could look into that (but you could have done exactly the same).

    IN SHORT

    This is a problem/bug with optional as provided by Apple on OSX, but there is an easy workaround.

    WHAT'S GOING ON

    The file /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/include/c++/v1/exper‌​imental/optional declares the offending function optional::value as

    template <class _Tp>
    class optional
        : private __optional_storage<_Tp>
    {
      /* ... */
    
      _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS
      constexpr value_type const& value() const
      {
        if (!this->__engaged_)
            throw bad_optional_access();
        return this->__val_;
      }
    
      _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS
      value_type& value()
      {
        if (!this->__engaged_)
            throw bad_optional_access();
        return this->__val_;
      }
      /* ... */
    };
    

    Running the preprocessor only (compiler option -E) reveals that the macros expand to

    #define _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY \
      __attribute__ ((__visibility__("hidden"), __always_inline__))
    #define _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS \
      __attribute__((unavailable))
    

    In particular, the macro _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS is #defined in file /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/include/c++/v1/__config as

    // Define availability macros.
    #if defined(_LIBCPP_USE_AVAILABILITY_APPLE)
    // ...
    #define _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS __attribute__((unavailable))
    // ...
    #else
    // ...
    #define _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS
    // ...
    #endif
    

    Thus, this is a Apple specific change from LLVM's libc++ API. As the name of the macro implies, the reason is that Apple does not make

    class bad_optional_access
    : public std::logic_error
    {
    public:
      bad_optional_access() : std::logic_error("Bad optional Access") {}
      virtual ~bad_optional_access() noexcept;
    };
    

    available and hence cannot implement functionality (optional::value) that depends on it. Why bad_optional_access is not provided (thereby breaking the standard) is unclear, but it may have to do with the fact that a library (dylib) must be altered to contain bad_optional_access::~bad_optional_access().

    HOW TO WORK AROUND

    simply use optional::operator* instead

    int p = *res;
    

    The only real difference is that no access check is done. If you need that, do it yourself

    template<typename T>
    T& get_value(std::experimental::optional<T> &opt)
    {
      if(!opt.has_value())
        throw std::logic_error("bad optional access");
      return *opt;
    }
    
    template<typename T>
    T const& get_value(std::experimental::optional<T>const &opt)
    {
      if(!opt.has_value())
        throw std::logic_error("bad optional access");
      return *opt;
    }