Search code examples
pythonpython-2.7numpymachine-learningkernel-density

How can I optimize the calculation over this function in numpy?


I want to implement the following problem in numpy and here is my code.

I've tried the following numpy code for this problem with one for loop. I am wondering if there is any more efficient way of doing this calculation? I really appreciate that!

k, d = X.shape
m = Y.shape[0]

c1 = 2.0*sigma**2
c2 = 0.5*np.log(np.pi*c1)
c3 = np.log(1.0/k)

L_B = np.zeros((m,))
for i in xrange(m):
    if i % 100 == 0:
        print i
    L_B[i] = np.log(np.sum(np.exp(np.sum(-np.divide(
                np.power(X-Y[i,:],2), c1)-c2,1)+c3)))

print np.mean(L_B)

I've thought of np.expand_dims(X, 2).repeat(Y.shape[0], 2)-Y by creating a 3D tensor therefore the following calculation can be done by broadcasting, but that would waste a lot of memory when m is large.

I also believe that the np.einsum() utilizes nothing but the for loop so might not be that efficient, correct me if I am wrong.

Any thought?


Solution

  • Optimization Stage #1

    My first level of optimizations using a direct translation of the loopy code to a broadcasting based one upon introducing a new axis and as such not so memory efficient one, as listed below -

    p1 = (-((X[:,None] - Y)**2)/c1)-c2
    p11 = p1.sum(2)
    p2 = np.exp(p11+c3)
    out = np.log(p2.sum(0)).mean()
    

    Optimization Stage #2

    Bringing in few optimizations keeping in mind that we intend to separate out the operations on the constants, I ended up with the following -

    c10 = -c1
    c20 = X.shape[1]*c2
    
    subs = (X[:,None] - Y)**2
    p00 = subs.sum(2)
    p10 = p00/c10
    p11 = p10-c20
    p2 = np.exp(p11+c3)
    out = np.log(p2.sum(0)).mean()
    

    Optimization Stage #3

    Going further with it and and seeing the places where the operations could be optimized, I ended up using Scipy's cdist to replace the heavy-weight work of the squaring and sum-reduction. This should be pretty memory efficient and gave us the final implementation, as shown below -

    from scipy.spatial.distance import cdist
    
    # Setup constants
    c10 = -c1
    c20 = X.shape[1]*c2
    c30 = c20-c3
    c40 = np.exp(c30)
    c50 = np.log(c40)
    
    # Get stagewise operations corresponding to loopy ones
    p1 = cdist(X, Y, 'sqeuclidean')
    p2 = np.exp(p1/c10).sum(0)
    out = np.log(p2).mean() - c50
    

    Runtime test

    Approaches -

    def loopy_app(X, Y, sigma):
        k, d = X.shape
        m = Y.shape[0]
    
        c1 = 2.0*sigma**2
        c2 = 0.5*np.log(np.pi*c1)
        c3 = np.log(1.0/k)
    
        L_B = np.zeros((m,))
        for i in xrange(m):
            L_B[i] = np.log(np.sum(np.exp(np.sum(-np.divide(
                        np.power(X-Y[i,:],2), c1)-c2,1)+c3)))
    
        return np.mean(L_B)
    
    def vectorized_app(X, Y, sigma):
        # Setup constants
        k, d = D_A.shape
        c1 = 2.0*sigma**2
        c2 = 0.5*np.log(np.pi*c1)
        c3 = np.log(1.0/k)
    
        c10 = -c1
        c20 = X.shape[1]*c2
        c30 = c20-c3
        c40 = np.exp(c30)
        c50 = np.log(c40)
    
        # Get stagewise operations corresponding to loopy ones
        p1 = cdist(X, Y, 'sqeuclidean')
        p2 = np.exp(p1/c10).sum(0)
        out = np.log(p2).mean() - c50
        return out
    

    Timings and verification -

    In [294]: # Setup inputs with m(=D_B.shape[0]) being a large number
         ...: X = np.random.randint(0,9,(100,10))
         ...: Y = np.random.randint(0,9,(10000,10))
         ...: sigma = 2.34
         ...: 
    
    In [295]: np.allclose(loopy_app(X, Y, sigma),vectorized_app(X, Y, sigma))
    Out[295]: True
    
    In [296]: %timeit loopy_app(X, Y, sigma)
    1 loops, best of 3: 225 ms per loop
    
    In [297]: %timeit vectorized_app(X, Y, sigma)
    10 loops, best of 3: 23.6 ms per loop
    
    In [298]: # Setup inputs with m(=Y.shape[0]) being a much large number
         ...: X = np.random.randint(0,9,(100,10))
         ...: Y = np.random.randint(0,9,(100000,10))
         ...: sigma = 2.34
         ...: 
    
    In [299]: np.allclose(loopy_app(X, Y, sigma),vectorized_app(X, Y, sigma))
    Out[299]: True
    
    In [300]: %timeit loopy_app(X, Y, sigma)
    1 loops, best of 3: 2.27 s per loop
    
    In [301]: %timeit vectorized_app(X, Y, sigma)
    1 loops, best of 3: 243 ms per loop
    

    Around 10x speedup there!