Search code examples
c#sql-serverado.netdapper

Fastest way to map result of SqlDataReader to object


I'm comparing materialize time between Dapper and ADO.NET and Dapper. Ultimately, Dapper tend to faster than ADO.NET, though the first time a given fetch query was executed is slower than ADO.NET. a few result show that Dapper a little bit faster than ADO.NET(almost all of result show that it comparable though)
So I think I'm using inefficient approach to map result of SqlDataReader to object.
This is my code

var sql = "SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader WHERE SalesOrderID = @Id";
        var conn = new SqlConnection(ConnectionString);
        var stopWatch = new Stopwatch();

        try
        {
            conn.Open();
            var sqlCmd = new SqlCommand(sql, conn);

            for (var i = 0; i < keys.GetLength(0); i++)
            {
                for (var r = 0; r < keys.GetLength(1); r++)
                {
                    stopWatch.Restart();
                    sqlCmd.Parameters.Clear();
                    sqlCmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Id", keys[i, r]);
                    var reader = await sqlCmd.ExecuteReaderAsync();
                    SalesOrderHeaderSQLserver salesOrderHeader = null;

                    while (await reader.ReadAsync())
                    {
                        salesOrderHeader = new SalesOrderHeaderSQLserver();
                        salesOrderHeader.SalesOrderId = (int)reader["SalesOrderId"];
                        salesOrderHeader.SalesOrderNumber = reader["SalesOrderNumber"] as string;
                        salesOrderHeader.AccountNumber = reader["AccountNumber"] as string;
                        salesOrderHeader.BillToAddressID = (int)reader["BillToAddressID"];
                        salesOrderHeader.TotalDue = (decimal)reader["TotalDue"];
                        salesOrderHeader.Comment = reader["Comment"] as string;
                        salesOrderHeader.DueDate = (DateTime)reader["DueDate"];
                        salesOrderHeader.CurrencyRateID = reader["CurrencyRateID"] as int?;
                        salesOrderHeader.CustomerID = (int)reader["CustomerID"];
                        salesOrderHeader.SalesPersonID = reader["SalesPersonID"] as int?;
                        salesOrderHeader.CreditCardApprovalCode = reader["CreditCardApprovalCode"] as string;
                        salesOrderHeader.ShipDate = reader["ShipDate"] as DateTime?;
                        salesOrderHeader.Freight = (decimal)reader["Freight"];
                        salesOrderHeader.ModifiedDate = (DateTime)reader["ModifiedDate"];
                        salesOrderHeader.OrderDate = (DateTime)reader["OrderDate"];
                        salesOrderHeader.TerritoryID = reader["TerritoryID"] as int?;
                        salesOrderHeader.CreditCardID = reader["CreditCardID"] as int?;
                        salesOrderHeader.OnlineOrderFlag = (bool)reader["OnlineOrderFlag"];
                        salesOrderHeader.PurchaseOrderNumber = reader["PurchaseOrderNumber"] as string;
                        salesOrderHeader.RevisionNumber = (byte)reader["RevisionNumber"];
                        salesOrderHeader.Rowguid = (Guid)reader["Rowguid"];
                        salesOrderHeader.ShipMethodID = (int)reader["ShipMethodID"];
                        salesOrderHeader.ShipToAddressID = (int)reader["ShipToAddressID"];
                        salesOrderHeader.Status = (byte)reader["Status"];
                        salesOrderHeader.SubTotal = (decimal)reader["SubTotal"];
                        salesOrderHeader.TaxAmt = (decimal)reader["TaxAmt"];
                    }

                    stopWatch.Stop();
                    reader.Close();
                    await PrintTestFindByPKReport(stopWatch.ElapsedMilliseconds, salesOrderHeader.SalesOrderId.ToString());
                }

I used as keyword to cast in nullable column, is that correct?
and this is code for Dapper.

using (var conn = new SqlConnection(ConnectionString))
        {
            conn.Open();
            var stopWatch = new Stopwatch();

            for (var i = 0; i < keys.GetLength(0); i++)
            {
                for (var r = 0; r < keys.GetLength(1); r++)
                {
                    stopWatch.Restart();
                    var result = (await conn.QueryAsync<SalesOrderHeader>("SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader WHERE SalesOrderID = @Id", new { Id = keys[i, r] })).FirstOrDefault();
                    stopWatch.Stop();
                    await PrintTestFindByPKReport(stopWatch.ElapsedMilliseconds, result.ToString());
                }
            }
        }

Solution

  • Here's a way to make your ADO.NET code faster.

    When you do your select, list out the fields that you are selecting rather than using select *. This will let you ensure the order that the fields are coming back even if that order changes in the database.Then when getting those fields from the Reader, get them by index rather than by name. Using and index is faster.

    Also, I'd recommend not making string database fields nullable unless there is a strong business reason. Then just store a blank string in the database if there is no value. Finally I'd recommend using the Get methods on the DataReader to get your fields in the type they are so that casting isn't needed in your code. So for example instead of casting the DataReader[index++] value as an int use DataReader.GetInt(index++)

    So for example, this code:

     salesOrderHeader = new SalesOrderHeaderSQLserver();
     salesOrderHeader.SalesOrderId = (int)reader["SalesOrderId"];
     salesOrderHeader.SalesOrderNumber =       reader["SalesOrderNumber"] as string;
     salesOrderHeader.AccountNumber = reader["AccountNumber"] as string;
    

    becomes

     int index = 0;
     salesOrderHeader = new SalesOrderHeaderSQLserver();
     salesOrderHeader.SalesOrderId = reader.GetInt(index++);
     salesOrderHeader.SalesOrderNumber = reader.GetString(index++);
     salesOrderHeader.AccountNumber = reader.GetString(index++);
    

    Give that a whirl and see how it does for you.