I have a class that encapsulates access to an array in a wierd way; The class constructor takes a function handle which is some kind of transformation of indexes before passing them to the array
classdef MyClass
properties
arr
accessHandle
end
methods
function obj = MyClass(array, trans)
obj.arr = array;
obj.accessHandle = @(i) obj.arr(trans(i))
end
end
The problem is the anonymous function copies the array into it's own workspace and if we change the array, it doesn't change in the function. Essentially what is needed is to pass to the anonymous function the 'this' pointer/reference like in Java/C++/etc
The simple solution is to create a handle to the array and pass it along to the function:
classdef MyClass
properties
arr
accessHandle
end
methods
function obj = MyClass(array, trans)
obj.arr = array;
tmp = PropertyReference(obj, 'arr'); %See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7085588/matlab-create-reference-handle-to-variable
%for the definition
obj.accessHandle = @(i) tmp(trans(i));
end
end
end
The problem now is when I pass an instance of the class to a function, the reference passed still refers to the object outside the function:
function foo(ins)
ins.arr = [1 2];
disp(ins.accessHandle(1));
end
cl = MyClass([0 3], @(x) x);
foo(cl) //output 0 instead of 1
disp(ins.accessHandle(1)) //output 0
EDIT: The class should be a value class, the semantics are that when a copy of the class is made, the accessHandle
field changes the array handle it uses.
How can I achieve the right semantics ?
Currently, your class is a value class (MATLAB's default). If you want to be able to pass objects around by reference (changes will be reflected in the original object), you'll to make it a handle class by subclassing handle
classdef MyClass < handle
properties
arr
accessHandle
end
methods
function obj = MyClass(array, trans)
obj.arr = array;
obj.accessHandle = @(i) obj.arr(trans(i))
end
end
end
And then you can use it the way you expect
m = MyClass([1 2 3], @(x)x);
m.accessHandle(2)
% 2
m.arr(2) = 5;
m.accessHandle(2)
% 5
More information about the difference between the two can be found here.
Edit
If you need MyClass
to be a value class, then you could store the trans
value as a property and then have a normal method to access the value
classdef MyClass
properties
arr
trans
end
methods
function obj = MyClass(array, trans)
obj.arr = array;
obj.trans = trans;
end
function res = access(obj, k)
res = obj.arr(obj.trans(k));
end
end
end
Or if you want, you could make accessHandle
a dependent property that returns a function handle.
classdef MyClass
properties
arr
trans
end
properties (Dependent)
accessHandle
end
methods
function obj = MyClass(array, trans)
obj.arr = array;
obj.trans = trans;
end
function res = get.accessHandle(obj)
res = @(i)obj.arr(obj.trans(i));
end
end
end