I was left a comment that many-many associations are to be avoided, but I cannot find the original comment/user who left me this info. So I'm asking the community, are many-many associations to be avoided, if so why, and what is the alternative?
example:
A restaurant offers many types of burgers which can be dressed with many different condiments.
Is this not a many-to-many association? Does it not require a relation table that contains the foriegn keys for the BURGER table and the CONDIMENT table?
Thanks in advance,
BW
M:N associations cannot be avoided if one wants to model relationships like the burger/condiment one you mentioned. There is nothing intrinsically undesirable about M:N associations. And yes, they need a third table.
Often people try to put extra attributes on the relationship, incorrectly modeling two 1:N associations as an M:N one. Maybe this is what the OP meant about avoiding M:N associations.