I have used Lua.NET on .NET platform and I could call the .NET class/object from Lua and I could call the Lua from .NET Lua API interface. I did the same with the IronPython. I knew the how the .NET binding works.
Now I have a C++ project and I want to use the dynamic capabilities. I want to call C++ object which may not be possible from Lua so I may need to call some C API which makes call to C++. Meantime I want to call the Lua from C++.
We have configuration data which is best described in table like format in Lua or List & Dict like in Python. We need to enumerate these data structures defined in Lua/Python in C++.
When considering Lua to Python in C++ for two way calling, is Python have upper hand with Boost Python library? I don't have experience in Python/C++ binding. I don't have equal experience of using Python in C++ and calling Python from C++.
When considering Lua to Python in C++ for two way calling, is Python have upper hand with Boost Python library?
There are a few libraries that simplify the communication between C++ and Lua. One of them, luabind, is inspired by boost.python and is quite powerful and fairly easy to use.