I see here boost::filesystem::is_regular
is guarded by BOOST_FILESYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED
, so I assume it shouldn't be used anymore.
I tested both methods on files and they seem to give the same result, but given that I can't find anywhere the documentation of these methods, what is the actual difference between boost::filesystem::is_regular
and boost::filesystem::is_regular_file
? Are they the same thing or the former is more generic (e.g.: regular symlink, etc.)?
They are identical:
inline bool is_regular_file(file_status f) BOOST_NOEXCEPT {
return f.type() == regular_file;
}
inline bool is_regular(file_status f) BOOST_NOEXCEPT {
return f.type() == regular_file;
}
Sources:
I suspect that is_regular()
was deprecated when the Filesystem TS decided to call that function is_regular_file()
instead.