So I'm probably missing the obvious here, but what actually is the difference between the functionality of the TraceSwitch
and SourceSwitch
classes?
They both give identical summary descriptions:
Provides a multilevel switch to control tracing and debug output without recompiling your code.
Are the Remarks sections are oddly similar to my eyes. Could someone please clarify the difference in their functionality and usage cases?
(For completeness, I'm using switches with my TraceSource
object, rather than the old static Trace
class, though I doubt it makes much difference.)
The difference is that TraceSwitch
works with Trace
messages whereas SourceSwitch
works with TraceSource
messages, which associate the messages with their source. So with a SourceSwitch
you can configure your listeners based on on where the trace messages came from.
I agree the documentation doesn't directly point out the difference, but dig around in the related TraceSource
class documentation and you'll find this:
The
TraceSource
class is identified by the name of a source, typically the name of the application. The trace messages coming from a particular component can be initiated by a particular trace source, allowing all messages coming from that component to be easily identified.
There is also a sample showing you how to configure a SourceSwitch
to turn off tracing from a trace source.