I want to define block and call it in this way:
add := [ :a :b |
^(a+b).
].
n := add value: 1 value: 2.
But when I try it, I get an error:
$ gst 3.1.st
Object: 3 error: return from a dead method context
SystemExceptions.BadReturn(Exception)>>signal (ExcHandling.st:254)
SystemExceptions.BadReturn class(Exception class)>>signal (ExcHandling.st:151)
SmallInteger(Object)>>badReturnError (Object.st:1389)
UndefinedObject>>executeStatements (3.1.st:3)
How can I call a function in GNU Smalltalk?
Well, I dropped the return statement, and this code works fine. But when I try to define more complicated function, for example:
nod := [ :a :b |
(a=b) ifTrue: [a].
(a>b) ifTrue: [nod value: (a-b) value: b].
(a<b) ifTrue: [nod value: a value: (b-a)].
].
n := nod value: 1 value: 2.
n printNl.
It prints nil. And if I define with "early exit":
nod := [ :a :b |
(a=b) ifTrue: [^a].
(a>b) ifTrue: [nod value: (a-b) value: b].
(a<b) ifTrue: [nod value: a value: (b-a)].
].
n := nod value: 1 value: 2.
n printNl.
It gives me the same error: return from a dead method context.
I solve this problem in this way:
nod := [ :a :b |
(a=b) ifTrue: [
a
] ifFalse: [
(a>b) ifTrue: [nod value: (a-b) value: b] ifFalse: [nod value: a value: (b-a)].
]
].
n := nod value: 1 value: 2.
n printNl.
But I think, it is not beautiful way.
Drop the return statement (^
) from your code and it will work fine.
In smalltalk, returning exits the method in which the return statement appears. It's used for early exits, for example a < b ifTrue: [^a] ifFalse:[^b]
.
In this case, you don't want the block to exit the containing method, you just want it to evaluate to something when sending it value:value:
. A block evaluates to the last statement in it, so just make it a regular statement there and it will do the trick.
The error message you got, by the way, also explains the problem: you're trying to return 3
from a method which is already dead.