Are there any reasons why UNIONs shouldn't be used in the WHERE clause of update subqueries? Or for that matter, even normal select subqueries?
Is there a better way such a query to eliminate the UNION?
Note that for my case, the UNION will result in a fairly small number of records.
UPDATE mytable
set mytable.bla='xxx'
WHERE id IN (
SELECT id
FROM t1
INNER JOIN t2 ON t2.t1_id=t1.id
LEFT OUTER JOIN t3 ON t3.t1_id=t2.id
WHERE t2.id IN (1,2,3) AND t3.id IS NULL
UNION
SELECT id FROM t4
INNER JOIN t5 ON t5.id=t4.t5_id
LEFT OUTER JOIN t6 ON t6.t5_id=t5.id
WHERE t5.parent_id IN (1,2,3) AND t6.id IS NULL
);
Switching it to a join:-
UPDATE mytable
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT id
FROM t1
INNER JOIN t2 ON t2.t1_id=t1.id
LEFT OUTER JOIN t3 ON t3.t1_id=t2.id
WHERE t2.id IN (1,2,3)
AND t3.id IS NULL
UNION
SELECT id
FROM t4
INNER JOIN t5 ON t5.id=t4.t5_id
LEFT OUTER JOIN t6 ON t6.t5_id=t5.id
WHERE t5.parent_id IN (1,2,3)
AND t6.id IS NULL
) sub0
ON mytable.id = sub0.id
SET mytable.bla='xxx'