I have created a custom directive and would like to mock out a variable to make the test working. This is part of the unit test:
it('should pass on initialvalue', function() {
scope.$apply(function() {
scope.initial = 2;
scope.Repairer = null;
});
expect(elementScope.initial).toEqual(2);
});
The directive is calls a service when the initial-variable is set. Both tests are failing because in the directive I have a variable called request that is not properly mocked. The question is how can I mock this out? Or do I need to put the request variable on scope? This is part of the code:
if (scope.Repairer) {
console.log('calling scriptservice');
var request = {
allocationProcess: (scope.$parent.lodgement.searchSettings.automatic.visible) ? 'automatic' : 'direct',
allocationSource: 'internal',
brand: brandScriptTag, // lookup brand scripting name
includeSegment: false,
relationship: scope.repairer.relationshipCode,
ruralSearch: scope.repairer.isRural,
state: scope.$parent.lodgement.claimLocation
};
scriptingService.getScript(request).then(function (scripts) {
scope.scripts = scripts;
});
} else {
scope.scripts = null;
}
plunker ref:http://plnkr.co/edit/juDwpot727jzxzzWeaJl?p=preview
You are accessing an object on the $parent
scope, so I'de do somthing like:
$rootScope.lodgement = jasmine.any(Object);
However, your code is problematic since it's asuming a lot about this lodgement
...
//it's better to use jasmine.any(Object)
//$rootScope.lodgement = jasmine.any(Object);
var lodgement_mock = {searchSettings:{automatic:{visible:false}}};
$rootScope.lodgement = lodgement_mock;
p.s.
you had another error in your directive - you tried accessing scope.repairer
instead of scope.Repairer
check out this: http://plnkr.co/edit/OFTZff53BXGNLQqRfE8L?p=preview