Suppose we've got two integer and character variables:
int adad=12345;
char character;
Assuming we're discussing a platform in which, length of an integer variable is longer than or equal to three bytes, I want to access third byte of this integer and put it in the character variable, with that said I'd write it like this:
character=*((char *)(&adad)+2);
Considering that line of code and the fact that I'm not a compiler or assembly expert, I know a little about addressing modes in assembly and I'm wondering the address of the third byte (or I guess it's better to say offset of the third byte) here would be within the instructions generated by that line of code themselves, or it'd be in a separate variable whose address (or offset) is within those instructions ?
The best thing to do in situations like this is to try it. Here's an example program:
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int adad=12345;
volatile char character;
character=*((char *)(&adad)+2);
return 0;
}
I added the volatile
to avoid the assignment line being completely optimized away. Now, here's what the compiler came up with (for -Oz
on my Mac):
_main:
pushq %rbp
movq %rsp,%rbp
movl $0x00003039,0xf8(%rbp)
movb 0xfa(%rbp),%al
movb %al,0xff(%rbp)
xorl %eax,%eax
leave
ret
The only three lines that we care about are:
movl $0x00003039,0xf8(%rbp)
movb 0xfa(%rbp),%al
movb %al,0xff(%rbp)
The movl
is the initialization of adad
. Then, as you can see, it reads out the 3rd byte of adad
, and stores it back into memory (the volatile
is forcing that store back).
I guess a good question is why does it matter to you what assembly gets generated? For example, just by changing my optimization flag to -O0
, the assembly output for the interesting part of the code is:
movl $0x00003039,0xf8(%rbp)
leaq 0xf8(%rbp),%rax
addq $0x02,%rax
movzbl (%rax),%eax
movb %al,0xff(%rbp)
Which is pretty straightforwardly seen as the exact logical operations of your code:
adad
adad
character
Various optimizations will change the output... if you really need some specific behaviour/addressing mode for some reason, you might have to write the assembly yourself.