Is there any difference in the logic or performance of using the word and
vs. the &
symbol in Python?
and
is a Boolean operator. It treats both arguments as Boolean values, returning the first if it's falsy, otherwise the second. Note that if the first is falsy, then the second argument isn't even computed at all, which is important for avoiding side effects.
Examples:
False and True --> False
True and True --> True
1 and 2 --> 2
False and None.explode() --> False
(no exception)&
has two behaviors.
int
, then it computes the bitwise AND of both numbers, returning an int
. If one is int
and one is bool
, then the bool
value is coerced to int (as 0 or 1) and the same logic applies.bool
, then both arguments are evaluated and a bool
is returned.TypeError
is raised (such as float & float
, etc.).Examples:
1 & 2 --> 0
1 & True --> 1 & 1 --> 1
True & 2 --> 1 & 2 --> 0
True & True --> True
False & None.explode() --> AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'explode'