I am currently using knitr in R and RStudio to produce a LaTeX output. My code is a .Rnw file (called, say, testKnitr.Rnw) that is compiled to a pdf file with:
knit("testKnitr.Rnw") // in RStudio
pdflatex testKnitr.tex // in terminal
I would like to use an if-else syntax in LaTeX so that, depending on the value of an R variable, one of two LaTeX text paragraphs are output. In these LaTeX paragraphs, I would like to use expressions like \Sexpr{} and and \ref.
I have a minimal-working-example that is based on the second answer to a similar question posted here:
How to write an if-then statement in LaTeX using the value of an R variable in knitr/Sweave
Here is the MWE:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
<<include=FALSE>>=
library(knitr)
opts_chunk$set(
concordance=TRUE
)
@
<<condition, include=FALSE, echo=FALSE>>=
x<- rnorm(1)
if(x>0){
text <- "This means x value of \Sexpr{x} was greater than 0"
}else{
text <- "This means x value of \Sexpr{x} was less than 0"
}
@
Testing the code:
<<print, results='asis', echo=FALSE>>=
cat(text)
@
\end{document}
Ideally, the intended output of the above MWE would a report with one line that contained something like:
"This means x value of 0.87 was greater than 0"
or
"This means x value of -0.87 was less than 0"
Before answering this question, I would like to take a look at the meta-question of whether this should be done.
I don't think so. What we are basically doing here is using knitr
to insert \Sexpr{x}
in a document and then interpret \Sexpr{x}
. There are no (obvious) reasons why we should take this detour instead of inserting the value of x
directly to the document.
The following minimal example shows how it could be done anyways:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
<<setup, echo = FALSE>>=
library(knitr)
knit_patterns$set(header.begin = NULL)
@
<<condition, echo=FALSE>>=
x <- rnorm(1)
if (x > 0) {
text <- "This means x value of \\Sexpr{x} was greater than 0"
} else {
text <- "This means x value of \\Sexpr{x} was less than 0"
}
@
Testing the code:
<<print, results='asis', echo=FALSE>>=
cat(text)
@
\end{document}
Two things are important here:
\Sexpr
, resulting in \Sexpr
.knit_patterns$set(header.begin = NULL)
.To compile the document:
doc.Rnw
.Then execute:
knitEnv <- new.env()
knit(input = "doc.Rnw", output = "intermediate.Rnw", envir = knitEnv)
knit2pdf(input = "intermediate.Rnw", output = "doc_final.tex", envir = knitEnv)
The first call of knit
generates intermediate.Rnw
with the following content:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
Testing the code:
This means x value of \Sexpr{x} was less than 0
\end{document}
You should note that knitr
didn't include any definitions, commands etc. as usual to the LaTeX code. This is due to setting header.begin = NULL
and documented here. We need this behavior because we want to knit the resulting document again in the second step and LaTeX doesn't like it when the same stuff is defined twice.
Creating the new environment knitEnv
and setting it as envir
is optional. If we skip this, the variable x
will be created in the global environment.
In the second step we use knit2pdf
to knit intermediate.Rnw
and immediately generate a PDF afterwards. If envir
was used in the first step, we need to use it here too. This is how x
and it's value are conveyed from the first to the second knitting step.
This time all the gory LaTeX stuff is included and we get doc_final.tex
with:
\documentclass{article}\usepackage[]{graphicx}\usepackage[]{color}
%% maxwidth is the original width if it is less than linewidth
%% otherwise use linewidth (to make sure the graphics do not exceed the margin)
\makeatletter
\def\maxwidth{ %
\ifdim\Gin@nat@width>\linewidth
\linewidth
\else
\Gin@nat@width
\fi
}
\makeatother
%% more gory stuff %%
\IfFileExists{upquote.sty}{\usepackage{upquote}}{}
\begin{document}
Testing the code:
This means x value of \ensuremath{-0.294859} was less than 0
\end{document}