I see developers frequently developing against a solution containing all the projects (27) in a system. This raises problems of build duration (5 minutes), performance of Visual Studio (such as intellisense latency), plus it doesn't force developer's to think about project dependencies (until they get a circular reference issue).
Is it a good idea to break down a solution like this into smaller solutions that are compilable and testable independent of the "mother" solution? Are there any potential pitfalls with this approach?
Let me restate your questions:
Is it a good idea to break down a solution like this into smaller solutions
The MSDN article you linked makes a quite clear statement:
Important Unless you have very good reasons to use a multi-solution model, you should avoid this and adopt either a single solution model, or in larger systems, a partitioned single solution model. These are simpler to work with and offer a number of significant advantages over the multi-solution model, which are discussed in the following sections.
Moreover, the article recommends that you always have a single "master" solution file in your build process.
Are there any potential pitfalls with this approach?
You will have to deal with the following issues (which actually can be quite hard to do, same source as the above quote):
The multi-solution model suffers from the following disadvantages:
- You are forced to use file references when you need to reference an assembly generated by a project in a separate solution. These (unlike project references) do not automatically set up build dependencies. This means that you must address the issue of solution build order within the system build script. While this can be managed, it adds extra complexity to the build process.
- You are also forced to reference a specific configuration build of a DLL (for example, the Release or Debug version). Project references automatically manage this and reference the currently active configuration in Visual Studio .NET.
- When you work with single solutions, you can get the latest code (perhaps in other projects) developed by other team members to perform local integration testing. You can confirm that nothing breaks before you check your code back into VSS ready for the next system build. In a multi-solution system this is much harder to do, because you can test your solution against other solutions only by using the results of the previous system build.