I have a template like:
template <class A, class B>
void func(A* a, B* b){
...
}
In some cases it happens that parameter B* b
is not needed and therefore, I try to use a nullptr:
MyA a;
func(&a, nullptr);
The compiler doesn't like that since nullptr
somehow is not a type.
How can I deal with that situation? The only idea is to just use a dummy type for that case.
The problem is that nullptr
is not actually a pointer, but an object of type nullptr_t
. So it cannot match either A*
or B*
. One option would be to provide an overload to specifically handle nullptr_t
.
template<class A>
void func(A* a, nullptr_t)
{
func(a, (int*)nullptr);
}
If you also want to allow the first argument to be nullptr
, you can provide 2 more overloads. One to handle just the first argument, and one to handle both.
template<class B>
void func(nullptr_t, B* b)
{
func((int*)nullptr, b);
}
void func(nullptr_t, nullptr_t)
{
func((int*)nullptr, (int*)nullptr);
}
For any more arguments, this approach becomes unfeasible without code generation, as the number of overloads required is an exponential function of the number of arguments. In that case, I would recommend jrok's approach.