JSF 2.0 Problem (faces-config)

We have faces-config.xml in JSF 1.0 where we entry about managed-beans, dependencies & navigations etc.

I was developing a sample project using JSF 2.0. But, as I don't know annotation, I need to include face-config.xml externally. Please, provide the solution for it, as in JSF 2.0 we don't need to include it. What is reason behind it? How do we set a bean as managed-bean. What is annotation? How is it used?

Solution

(...) in JSF 2.0 we don't need to include it. What is reason behind it?

In three words: ease of development. There is just less code to write -- boilerplate code is removed, defaults are used whenever possible, and annotations are used to reduce the need for deployment descriptors.

How do we set a bean as managed-bean. What is annotation? How is it used?

Managed beans are identified using the @ManagedBean annotation. The scope of the bean is also specified using annotations (@RequestScoped, @SessionScoped, @ApplicationScoped, etc).

So the following in JSF 1.0:

<managed-bean>
  <managed-bean-name>foo</managed-bean-name>
  <managed-bean-class>com.foo.Foo</managed-bean-class>
  <managed-bean-scope>session</managed-bean>
</managed-bean>

Can be rewritten as such in JSF 2.0:

@ManagedBean
@SessionScoped
public class Foo {
    //...
}

And referred like this in a Facelet page:

<h:inputText label="eMailID" id="emailId" 
value="#{foo.email}" size="20" required="true"/>

(By default, the name of the managed bean will be the name of the annotated class, with the first letter of the class in lowercase.)

JSF 2.0 Problem (faces-config)

See also