I'm trying to run a Theano implementation of alexNet on some machines at work. When I first tried to run it I got the following error:
$ THEANO_FLAGS=mode=FAST_RUN,floatX=float32 python train.py
....
ImportError: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by /data1/software/analysis/libstdc++.6.0.15/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6)
Normally, what I would do in this situation is use my package manager to update libc, but this is not an option for work/administrative reasons. So, what I did instead was to install a local version of libc and to change LD_LIBRARY_PATH in my .bashrc file to point to it. Now, however, I get the following error:
$ THEANO_FLAGS=mode=FAST_RUN,floatX=float32 python train.py
python: relocation error: /data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14/lib64/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 with link time reference
Oddly enough, I get a similar 'relocation error' when I just try to 'ls'.
Does anyone know how I can install a version of libc that will only be used by my Python interpreter, but not by everything else?
Note: The libstdc++ I'm using is a locally installed version. I installed it for the same reason that I'm trying to install a local version of libc.
...
OK, I've progressed a little further, but am still stuck.
If I return to my old LD_LIBRARY_PATH, in order to avoid errors with commands like 'ls', I can verify that the new (local) libc does, in fact, use the old (system) ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
$ ldd /data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14/lib64/libc.so.6
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003b9d400000)
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff887ff000)
So, I thought I would change LD_LIBRARY_PATH to look for the new (local) ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
$ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
$ ls /data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14/lib64
ld-2.14.1.so libanl-2.14.1.so libcidn.so.1
libm-2.14.1.so libnss_compat.so.2 libnss_hesiod-2.14.1.so
libnss_nisplus.so.2 librt-2.14.1.so libutil.so.1
ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 libanl.so.1 libcrypt-2.14.1.so
libm.so.6 libnss_dns-2.14.1.so libnss_hesiod.so.2
libpthread-2.14.1.so librt.so.1 rtkaio
libBrokenLocale-2.14.1.so libc-2.14.1.so libcrypt.so.1
libnsl-2.14.1.so libnss_dns.so.2 libnss_nis-2.14.1.so
libpthread.so.0 libthread_db-1.0.so
libBrokenLocale.so.1 libc.so.6 libdl-2.14.1.so
libnsl.so.1 libnss_files-2.14.1.so libnss_nis.so.2
libresolv-2.14.1.so libthread_db.so.1
libSegFault.so libcidn-2.14.1.so libdl.so.2
libnss_compat-2.14.1.so libnss_files.so.2 libnss_nisplus-2.14.1.so
libresolv.so.2 libutil-2.14.1.so
$ ldd /data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14/lib64/libc.so.6
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003b9d400000)
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffad5ff000)
$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14:
/data1/software/analysis
/libstdc++.6.0.15/usr/lib64:/data1/software/analysis/anaconda/lib:
/data2/software/stable/CUDA/5.5.22/lib:
/data2/software/stable/CUDA/5.5.22/include:
/data2/software/stable/CUDA/5.5.22/lib64:
/data1/software/analysis/anaconda/lib:
/data2/software/stable/CUDA/5.5.22/lib:
/data2/software/stable/CUDA/5.5.22/include:
/data2/software/stable/CUDA/5.5.22/lib64:
So, my libc should see the new ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. I can verify that this so has the symbol _dl_starting_up:
$ nm /data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 | grep _dl_start*
0000000000004c00 t _dl_start
000000000000fc30 t _dl_start_profile
0000000000001698 t _dl_start_user
0000000000220000 V _dl_starting_up
0000000000220000 b _dl_starting_up_internal
But, when I try to run the alexNet implementation using LD_PRELOAD to guarantee the use of the right libc, I still get the same error:
$ LD_PRELOAD=/data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14/lib64/libc.so.6 THEANO_FLAGS=mode=FAST_RUN,floatX=float32 python train.py
python: relocation error: /data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14/lib64/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 with link time reference
Why is the new (local) ld-linux not overriding the old (system) ld-linux? Shouldn't my setting of LD_LIBRARY_PATH have taken care of that?
If I try to force the issue, by preloading ld-linux, I get a segmentation fault:
$ LD_PRELOAD=/data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2:/data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14/lib64/libc.so.6 THEANO_FLAGS=mode=FAST_RUN,floatX=float32 python train.py
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
So, now I'm stuck. I don't know
Why my setting of LD_LIBRARY_PATH didn't force my new (local) libc to use the new (local) ld-linux.
What I should do about the segmentation fault when I force libc to use the new (local) ld-linux.
So, what I did instead was to install a local version of libc and to change LD_LIBRARY_PATH in my .bashrc file to point to it
See this answer for why that can't work.
Why my setting of LD_LIBRARY_PATH didn't force my new (local) libc to use the new (local) ld-linux.
As above answer explains, ld-linux
is baked into your executable at link time and can't be changed by LD_LIBRARY_PATH
.
What I should do about the segmentation fault when I force libc to use the new (local) ld-linux.
LD_PRELOAD
ing ld-linux
can never work: LD_PRELOAD
is interpreted by ld-linux
, so you are effectively forcing two separate ld-linux
es into your process, and that greatly confuses both of them.
So, what can you do?
It is in fact possible to install two separate versions of glibc on a single host, we do that every day. Instructions here.