As title says I get error:
line 55: Missing { inserted ... $$\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lambda_i v_i =O_\vec{E}
line 55: Missing } inserted ...v_n \in A =>\lambda_i =0,...,\lambda_n =0$
: Not defining \perthousand.
: Not defining \micro.
The exact line and its context are:
\begin{itemize}
\item On dit que A est \textit{libre} si le seule c. l. de vecteurs de A egales a $O_E$ est la c. l. triviale.
\item C'est-a-dire si:
$$\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lambda_i v_i =O_\vec{E}, v_1...v_n \in A =>\lambda_i =0,...,\lambda_n =0$$
\end{itemize}
The packages I have imported are:
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{gensymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage[margin=.75in, a4paper, portrait]{geometry}
The problem here stems from the somewhat greedy nature of the subscript routine when you use
O_\vec{E}
It grabs \vec
without it's argument giving rise to the problem. Here are my suggestions to fix your situation:
$$
...$$
. Instead, use \[
...\]
(see Why is \[
… \]
preferable to $$
… $$
?);amsmath
you can use smart \dots
;\implies
(say) instead of =>
Here is a complete minimal example:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\begin{itemize}
\item Here is some \textit{regular} text, mixed in with $O_E$ some math.
\item And a display equation:
\[
\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lambda_i v_i
= O_{\vec{E}}, v_1,\dots,v_n \in A
\implies \lambda_i = 0,\dots,\lambda_n
= 0
\]
\end{itemize}
\end{document}