I saw that @GMan implemented a version of sizeof...
for variadic templates which (as far as I can tell) is equivalent to the built in sizeof...
. Doesn't this go against the second design principle: prefer libraries to language extensions?
From Variadic Templates (Revision 3) (N2080=06-0150), page 6:
Although not strictly necessary (we can implement
count
without this feature), checking the length of a parameter pack is a common operation that deserves a simple syntax. Moreover, this operation may become necessary for type-checking reasons when variadic templates are combined with concepts; see Section 3.3.
(Section 3.3 talks about concepts which is irrelevant now.)