I'm sure there is way to improve this mixin using loops.
.generate-margin-tops(@size) {
.mt-@{size}-5 {
margin-top: 5px;
}
.mt-@{size}-10 {
margin-top: 10px;
}
.mt-@{size}-20 {
margin-top: 20px;
}
.mt-@{size}-30 {
margin-top: 30px;
}
.mt-@{size}-40 {
margin-top: 40px;
}
}
Snippet using for different screen dimensions:
.generate-margin-tops(xs);
@media (min-width: @screen-sm-min) {
.generate-margin-tops(sm);
}
@media (min-width: @screen-md-min) {
.generate-margin-tops(md);
}
@media (min-width: @screen-lg-min) {
.generate-margin-tops(lg);
}
This can be simplified using loops like below (explanation in-line in comments):
.generate-margin-tops(@size, @index) when (@index > 0) {
@margin-top: extract(@margin-px, @index); //extract the margin value corresponding to the index/counter variable
.mt-@{size}-@{margin-top} { //selector interpolation to form the selector
margin-top: unit(@margin-top,px); //converts plain number to px units
}
.generate-margin-tops(@size, @index - 1); //call to the next iteration by decrementing the counter
}
@margin-px: 5, 10, 20, 30, 40; //array list variable which contains the various margin pixels
.generate-margin-tops(xs, length(@margin-px)); //call to loop mixin
@media (min-width: @screen-sm-min) {
.generate-margin-tops(sm, length(@margin-px));
}
@media (min-width: @screen-md-min) {
.generate-margin-tops(md, length(@margin-px));
}
@media (min-width: @screen-lg-min) {
.generate-margin-tops(lg, length(@margin-px));
}