Search code examples
c++c++11lambdac++14perfect-forwarding

Capturing perfectly-forwarded variable in lambda


template<typename T> void doSomething(T&& mStuff)
{
    auto lambda([&mStuff]{ doStuff(std::forward<T>(mStuff)); });
    lambda();
}

Is it correct to capture the perfectly-forwarded mStuff variable with the &mStuff syntax?

Or is there a specific capture syntax for perfectly-forwarded variables?

EDIT: What if the perfectly-forwarded variable is a parameter pack?


Solution

  • Is it correct to capture the perfectly-forwarded mStuff variable with the &mStuff syntax?

    Yes, assuming that you don't use this lambda outside doSomething. Your code captures mStuff per reference and will correctly forward it inside the lambda.

    For mStuff being a parameter pack it suffices to use a simple-capture with a pack-expansion:

    template <typename... T> void doSomething(T&&... mStuff)
    {
        auto lambda = [&mStuff...]{ doStuff(std::forward<T>(mStuff)...); };
    }
    

    The lambda captures every element of mStuff per reference. The closure-object saves an lvalue reference for to each argument, regardless of its value category. Perfect forwarding still works; In fact, there isn't even a difference because named rvalue references would be lvalues anyway.