Search code examples
c++performancenested-loops

Why is there a significant difference in this C++ for loop's execution time?


I was going through loops and found a significant difference in accessing loops. I can't understand what is the thing that causes such difference in both cases?

First Example:

Execution Time; 8 seconds

for (int kk = 0; kk < 1000; kk++)
{
    sum = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
        for (int j = 0; j < 1024; j++)
        {
            sum += matrix[i][j];
        }
}

Second Example:

Execution Time: 23 seconds

for (int kk = 0; kk < 1000; kk++)
{
    sum = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
        for (int j = 0; j < 1024; j++)
        {
            sum += matrix[j][i];
        }
}

What causes so much execution time difference just exchanging

matrix[i][j] 

to

matrix[j][i]

?


Solution

  • It's an issue of memory cache.

    matrix[i][j] has better cache hits than matrix[j][i], since matrix[i][j] has more continuous memory accessing chances.

    For example, when we access matrix[i][0], the cache may load a continuous segment of memory containing matrix[i][0], thus, accessing matrix[i][1], matrix[i][2], ..., will benefit from caching speed, since matrix[i][1], matrix[i][2], ... are near to matrix[i][0].

    However, when we access matrix[j][0], it is far from matrix[j - 1][0] and may not been cached, and can not benefit from caching speed. Especially, a matrix is normally stored as a continuous big segment of memory, and the cacher may predicate the behavior of memory accessing and always cache the memory.

    That's why matrix[i][j] is faster. This is typical in CPU cache based performance optimizing.