logicprooffitch-proofs
Formal proof for P → Q ≡ ¬P ∨ Q in Fitch
I'm trying to construct a formal proof for 'P → Q ≡ ¬P ∨ Q' in Fitch. I know this is true, but how do I prove it?
Solution
I finally managed to solve it:
fairly straight forward actually
- DCG LaTeX printer for FOL prover
- C# logic order and compiler behavior
- Is there a better way to write this if statements?
- is it permissible to create more than one class diagram?
- What is the optimal algorithm for the game 2048?
- Azure Logic App problem with user assigned managed identity
- To pause and resume the program execution in the command prompt
- How can I generalize my recurring business rules in .NET Core?
- Bitwise operators order of precedence
- Java Collections Logic / Over coding issue
- How can I use a for loop to check whether any value matches a condition?
- SQL getting the data by timestamp interval
- I need an optimal way to iterate through the array
- What is the point of 'else' after a block which ends in 'return'
- Reason for "all" and "any" result on empty lists
- Algorithm to distribute variably-sized items into balanced groups preserving items order
- What is 1 XOR 1 XOR 1?
- Trying to enable / disable Azure logic app at specific time period
- Loops and comparing variable values
- In each column of a data frame , how to find out the duration for which each unique value in a column existed?
- Redux business logic best practice
- Azure Logic Apps: ExpressionEvaluationFailed failed
- Why is Prolog's failure by negation not considered logical negation?
- Can I use Sumproduct arrays and check two separate criteria counting TRUE statements?
- R method for comparing NAs between two vectors
- Largest product in a grid
- Formualting a logic in farmer astronaught
- Project Euler Solution 8, Explanation needed
- SAT can be verified in polynomial time, by a conversion to CNF, then verifying the SAT of the CNF in polynomial. What is wrong with this argument?
- codingbat Problem: close_far | failing only one test | heeeelp