Does the concept of shared sessions exist in ASP.NET?

Question

I am working on a web application (ASP.NET) game that would consist of a single page, and on that page, there would be a game board akin to Monopoly. I am trying to determine what the best architectural approach would be. The main requirements I have identified thus far are:

• Up to six users share a single game state object.
• The users need to keep (relatively) up to date on the current state of the game, i.e. whose turn it is, what did the active user just roll, how much money does each other user have, etc.

I have thought about keeping the game state in a database, but it seems like overkill to keep updating the database when a game state object (say, in a cache) could be kept up to date. For example, the flow might go like this:

1. Receive request for data from a user.
2. Look up data in database. Create object from that data.
3. Verify user has permissions to perform request based on the game's state (i.e. make sure it's really their turn or have enough money to buy that property).
4. Update the game object.
5. Write the game object back to the database.
6. Repeat for every single request.

Consider that a single server would be serving several concurrent games.

1. I have thought about using AJAX to make requests to an an ASP.NET page.
   
2. I have thought about using AJAX requests to a web service using silverlight.
   
3. I have thought about using WCF duplex channels in silverlight.

I can't figure out what the best approach is. All seem to have their drawbacks. Does anyone out there have experience with this sort of thing and care to share those experiences? Feel free to ask your own questions if I am being too ambiguous! Thanks.

Update: Does anyone have any suggestions for how to implement this connection to the server based on the three options I mention above?

Answer 1

While updating a database seems like overkill, it has advantages when it comes time to scale up, as you can have multiple webheads talking to one backend.

A larger concern is how you communicate the game state to the clients. While a full update of the game state from time to time ensures that any changes are caught and all clients remain in synchronization even if they miss a message, gamestate is often quite large.

Consider as well that usually you want gamestate messages to trigger animations or other display updates to portray the action (for example, of a piece moves, it shouldn't just appear at the destination in most cases... it should move across the board).

Because of that, one solution that combines the best of both worlds is to keep a database that collects all of the actions performed in a table, with sequential IDs. When a client requests an update, it can give all the actions after the last one it knew about, and the client can "act out" the moves. This means even if an request fails, it can simply retry the request and none of the actions will be lost.

The server can then maintain an internal view of the gamestate as well, from the same data. It can also reject illegal actions and prevent them from entering the game action table (and thus prevent other clients from being incorrectly updated).

Finally, because the server does have the "one true" gamestate, the clients can periodically check against that (which will allow you to find errors in your client or server code). Because the server database should be considered the primary, you can retransmit the entire gamestate to any client that gets incorrect state, so minor client errors won't (potentially) ruin the experience (except perhaps a pause while the state is downloaded).