What costs for sure less time for execution between the two options:
A:
if(something!=null){
...
}else{
//log
}
or:
B:
try{
something.getField();...
}catch(Exception e){
//log
}
Without even having to benchmark: Exception are ALWAYS way more expensive than programming defensively and using ifs as null-guard etc. Exceptions are always more expensive (several orders of magnitude), because the stack trace has to be generated.
Relevant SO question with benchmark: How slow are Java exceptions?