How to implement erase method in a doubly linked list

Question

I have to write a doubly linked list, I am trying to implement the erase(Type obj) method which takes an argument obj and traverses through the list and deletes every node which has the element obj.

The problem I am facing is, I am iterating through the linked list from front and when I find the node which has the obj element, I change the next/previous pointers of the the nodes before and after the node with obj element. However I am not DELETING the node with obj itself, as far as I know c++ has no garbage collection so the node which had obj is still somewhere hanging in the air. How do I delete that?

My erase()

template <typename Type>
int Double_list<Type>::erase( Type const &obj ) {
if (empty()){
    return 0;
}
if (size() == 1 && head()->retrieve() == obj){
    list_head = nullptr;
    list_tail = nullptr;
    list_size--;
    return 1;
}

//Counter to hold the number of items deleted
int count = 0;
    //Iterating through the linked list
for (Double_node<Type> *ptr = head(); ptr != nullptr; ptr = ptr->next()){
    if (ptr->retrieve() == obj){
        ptr->previous_node->next_node = ptr->next();
        ptr->next()->previous_node = ptr->previous();
        count++;
        // delete ptr; // This stops me from iterating through the for loop
        list_size--;
    }
}
return count;
}

Answer 1

While you traversing your list, you are doing it using pointer to nodes which is of type Double_node<Type> *, which means that it was allocated somewhere and could be deleted with simple delete ptr, but since you are using it also to get next element in list you have to be careful and remember it prematurely, so it should be something like:

Double_node<Type> *ptr_next = 0;
for (Double_node<Type> *ptr = head(); ptr != nullptr; ptr = ptr_next) {
     ptr_next = ptr->next ();
     if (ptr->retrieve() == obj){
     if (ptr->previous_node)
       ptr->previous_node->next_node = ptr->next();

     ptr->next()->previous_node = ptr->previous();
     count++;
     list_size--;
     delete ptr;
    }

I believe that should do the trick.