Search code examples
rubymodulelearn-ruby-the-hard-way

load 'file.rb' versus require 'Module' in Ruby

I am confused about the difference between load 'file.rb' and require 'Module'. At Learn Ruby the Hard Way, the example of how to use a module is set up with two files (mystuff.rb and apple.rb):

mystuff.rb

module MyStuff
    def MyStuff.apple()
        puts "I AM APPLES!"
    end
end

apple.rb

require 'mystuff'

MyStuff.apple()

However, when I run apple.rb, either in the Sublime Text console, or with ruby apple.rb, I get a Load Error. I have also tried require 'MyStuff', and require 'mystuff.rb', but I still get the Load Error.

So, I switched the first line of apple.rb to load 'mystuff.rb', which allows it to run. However, if I edit 'mystuff.rb' to be a definition of class MyStuff as opposed to a module MyStuff, there is no difference.

For reference, the Load Error is: /Users/David/.rvm/rubies/ruby-2.0.0-p353/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in require': cannot load such file -- mystuff (LoadError)`

I've peeked into kernel_require.rb and looked at the require definition, but since I'm a Ruby Nuby (indeed, a programming newbie), it was a little overwhelming. Since Learn Ruby the Hard Way hasn't been updated since 2012-10-05, there've probably been some syntax changes for modules. Yes?

Solution

  • You can solve this easily by changing 

    require 'mystuff'

    to

    require_relative './mystuff'