I am working on a project to implement an IRC daemon in C. This is still in a very early development stage, and all it does for now is to accept new connections on the main process, and for each new connection, it creates a thread. Every message from any client is broadcasted to all other connected clients.
I am using libev's callback mechanism so that threads do not block on a socket read. Each thread uses its own separate event loop. Here's a piece of my main()
function:
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int portno = 6667;
/* Libev stuff */
struct ev_loop *loop = EV_DEFAULT;
struct ev_io socket_watcher;
/* Here, I create a socket called mainsock_fd, and then call bind() and listen()
...
*/
/* At this point, we're ready to accept new clients. Set the callback function for new connections */
ev_io_init(&socket_watcher, connection_cb, mainsock_fd, EV_READ);
ev_io_start(loop, &socket_watcher);
/* This is where the problem lies */
ev_loop(loop, 0);
/* ... */
return 0;
}
I am no libev expert. I have been reading libev's documentation and example programs. This code works exactly as expected, but when I run it through valgrind, I get this error:
==20984== Command: ./yaircd
==20984==
==20984== Invalid read of size 1
==20984== at 0x40638D1: ev_run (in /usr/lib/libev.so.4.0.0)
==20984== by 0x804923F: ev_loop (ev.h:820)
==20984== by 0x8049410: main (yaircd.c:71)
==20984== Address 0xbedf52df is just below the stack ptr. To suppress, use: --workaround-gcc296-bugs=yes
Line 71 is this instruction:
ev_loop(loop, 0);
The error appears immediately after I start the program, with no clients connected. Just the fact that I call ev_loop
causes this error.
I don't know how to fix it. What I have coded so far is going to be the core of the IRC server, and I want to be absolutely sure no bugs exist. I'd like to have a clean valgrind output.
Any suggestions?
UPDATE: I compiled and executed their example program (http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.pod#EXAMPLE_PROGRAM), and valgrind reports the same error on it. I'm guessing this is some bug in libev
, or the example is not properly coded. I also read their section about valgrind - http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.pod#VALGRIND - but found nothing special about it. I guess I'll try their mailing list.
A similar problem has been submitted in libev
's mailing list before (see http://lists.schmorp.de/pipermail/libev/2013q2/002172.html).
According to the development crew, this is a harmless bug in valgrind
, as pointed out in this reply: http://lists.schmorp.de/pipermail/libev/2013q2/002173.html
No, this is just a (harmless) bug in valgrind, which apparently doesn't recognise the lock prefix correctly, or somesuch.
It doesn't affect correctness inside and outside of valgrind.