I'd like to determine, for each row, the total number of preceding records within a given time range.
A specific example:
clone=# \d test
Table "pg_temp_2.test"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------+-----------------------------+-----------
id | bigint |
date | timestamp without time zone |
I'd like to know for each date
the count of rows within '1 hour previous' to that date
.
Can I do this with a window function? Something like (pseudo-code, not working):
SELECT id, date
, count(*) OVER (HAVING previous_rows.date >= (date - '1 hour'::interval)) -- ?
FROM test;
I can write this by joining test against itself, as below - but this won't scale with large tables.
SELECT a.id, a.date, count(b.*)-1
FROM test a, test b
WHERE (b.date >= a.date - '1 hour'::interval AND b.date < a.date)
GROUP BY 1,2
ORDER BY 2;
Is this something I could do with a recursive query? Or with a regular Common Table Expression (CTE)?
Using ts
instead of the reserved word date
as column name. Also "date" is misleading for a timestamp.
CREATE TABLE test (
id bigint
, ts timestamp
);
Quoting the release notes for Postgres 11:
- Add all window function framing options specified by SQL:2011 (Oliver Ford, Tom Lane)
Specifically, allow
RANGE
mode to usePRECEDING
andFOLLOWING
to select rows having grouping values within plus or minus the specified offset. [...]
So this is simple now. And faster than older workarounds:
SELECT id, ts
, count(*) OVER (ORDER BY ts RANGE '1 hour' PRECEDING EXCLUDE CURRENT ROW)
FROM test
ORDER BY ts;
If there can be duplicates in ts
, you'll have to define how to count those, and possibly do more.
Syntax details in the manual.
You cannot do this cheaply with a plain query, CTEs and window functions - their frame definition is static, but you need a dynamic frame (depending on column values).
Generally, you'll have to define lower and upper bound of your window carefully: The following queries exclude the current row and include the lower border.
There is still a minor difference: the function includes previous peers of the current row, while the correlated subquery excludes them ...
Use CTEs, aggregate timestamps into an array, unnest, count ...
While correct, performance deteriorates drastically with more than a hand full of rows. There are a couple of performance killers here. See below.
I took Roman's query and tried to streamline it a bit:
count()
instead of re-aggregating into an array and counting with array_length()
.But array handling is expensive, and performance still deteriorates badly with more rows.
SELECT id, ts
, (SELECT count(*)::int - 1
FROM unnest(dates) x
WHERE x >= sub.ts - interval '1h') AS ct
FROM (
SELECT id, ts
, array_agg(ts) OVER(ORDER BY ts) AS dates
FROM test
) sub;
You could solve it with a simple correlated subquery. A lot faster, but still ...
SELECT id, ts
, (SELECT count(*)
FROM test t1
WHERE t1.ts >= t.ts - interval '1h'
AND t1.ts < t.ts) AS ct
FROM test t
ORDER BY ts;
Loop over rows in chronological order with a row_number()
in plpgsql function and combine that with a cursor over the same query, spanning the desired time frame. Then we can just subtract row numbers:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION running_window_ct(_intv interval = '1 hour')
RETURNS TABLE (id bigint, ts timestamp, ct int)
LANGUAGE plpgsql AS
$func$
DECLARE
cur CURSOR FOR
SELECT t.ts + _intv AS ts1
, row_number() OVER (ORDER BY t.ts ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING) AS rn
FROM test t
ORDER BY t.ts;
rec record;
rn int;
BEGIN
OPEN cur;
FETCH cur INTO rec;
ct := -1; -- init
FOR id, ts, rn IN
SELECT t.id, t.ts
, row_number() OVER (ORDER BY t.ts ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING)
FROM test t ORDER BY t.ts
LOOP
IF rec.ts1 >= ts THEN
ct := ct + 1;
ELSE
LOOP
FETCH cur INTO rec;
EXIT WHEN rec.ts1 >= ts;
END LOOP;
ct := rn - rec.rn;
END IF;
RETURN NEXT;
END LOOP;
END
$func$;
Why ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING
? See:
Call with default interval of one hour:
SELECT * FROM running_window_ct();
Or with any interval:
SELECT * FROM running_window_ct('2 hour - 3 second');
With the table from above I ran a quick benchmark on my old test server: (PostgreSQL 9.1.9 on Debian).
-- TRUNCATE test;
INSERT INTO test
SELECT g, '2013-08-08'::timestamp
+ g * interval '5 min'
+ random() * 300 * interval '1 min' -- halfway realistic values
FROM generate_series(1, 10000) g;
CREATE INDEX test_ts_idx ON test (ts);
ANALYZE test; -- temp table needs manual analyze
I varied the bold part for each run and took the best of 5 with EXPLAIN ANALYZE
.
100 rows
ROM: 27.656 ms
ARR: 7.834 ms
COR: 5.488 ms
FNC: 1.115 ms
1000 rows
ROM: 2116.029 ms
ARR: 189.679 ms
COR: 65.802 ms
FNC: 8.466 ms
5000 rows
ROM: 51347 ms !!
ARR: 3167 ms
COR: 333 ms
FNC: 42 ms
100000 rows
ROM: DNF
ARR: DNF
COR: 6760 ms
FNC: 828 ms
The function is the clear victor. It is fastest by an order of magnitude and scales best.
Array handling cannot compete.