I'm trying my first steps purely in grid
. As an exercise, I would like to create a pairs plot (similar to pairs()
) purely based on grid
. The function myplotGrob
below should create the grid object (grob; or gTree) and return the object.
I'm not sure
what's the best way to continue. Which units should one use? (tried "null"
, too)
Is frameGrob
meant to set up the layout? (this is what I understood from Paul Murrell's book) How do I have to choose/adjust the viewports such that I get the desired plot (so far, I only see a mess) Is the layout meant to be set up beforehand or is it better to just step-by-step "concatenate" additional panels to get the (4, 4) plot matrix?
require(grid)
require(mvtnorm)
set.seed(271)
X <- rmvnorm(1000, mean=1:4, sigma=diag(4:1)) # goal: draw this in a pairs plot
## auxiliary function
panel <- function(x, y) pointsGrob(x=x, y=y, name="panel", gp=gpar(), vp=NULL)
## creates and returns a gTree (class)
myplotGrob <- function(X, name=NULL, gp=NULL, vp=NULL)
{
## x-axis grob
## y-axis grob
## ...
## set up layout
layout <- grid.layout(4, 4, # (4, 4) matrix
widths=rep(0.25, 4), heights=rep(0.25, 4),
default.units="npc")
## pushViewport(viewport(layout=layout)) # required???
all <- frameGrob(layout=layout) # produces a gTree without children
for(i in 1:4) {
for(j in 1:4) {
## group grobs together
gt <- gTree(X,
children=gList(panel(X[,i], X[,j])),
name=name, gp=gp, vp=vp, cl="myplotGrob")
all <- placeGrob(all, gt, row=i, col=j)
}
}
all
}
## draw the gTree
grid.myplot <- function(...) grid.draw(myplotGrob(...))
## call
grid.myplot(X)
UPDATE
As it was asked for, here is the design/layout of the original problem I have in mind (the above would have only been a minimal/learning example). The units in cm were just for me (they should be 'relative' in the end). Of course, the number of panels may vary. I would like all parts to be grid objects, so that the function which creates the graphic will return an object (without printing/drawing). This way, each part can be modified afterwards. The graphic should display results from an array of dimension 5 (or less): one dimension is displayed in the row panels [row.vars
], one in the column panels [col.vars
], one on the x axis of each panel [xvar
], and each panel can contain 2 different dimensions of the array (differing by color and line type) [I used d
and n
in the drawing]. If course, if the array is four-dimensional, then row 8 of the above design should be missing. I can construct the layout via grid, but the whole question is how to continue from there. That's what I wanted to express with my "minimal example" above.
I think you can divide the task in two main parts, like the basic examples in grid.panel()
and grid.multipanel()
1- build a function that will produce a single panel, returned as a gTree. You need to figure out all the parameters, i.e. limits, axes, colours, shapes, grid, coordinates, ... You might end up rewriting lattice panel functions and axes,
grid.newpage()
grid::grid.panel(vp=viewport(width=0.8, height=0.8))
2- assemble the panels in a layout. This is much easier (and cleaner) with gtable,
library(gtable)
grid.newpage()
lg <- replicate(16, grobTree(rectGrob(), pointsGrob()), simplify=FALSE)
gt <- gtable_matrix("pairs", grobs=matrix(lg, ncol=4),
widths=unit(rep(1, 4), "null"),
heights=unit(rep(1, 4), "null"))
gt <- gtable_add_col_space(gt, width=unit(0.5,"line"))
gt <- gtable_add_row_space(gt, height=unit(0.5,"line"))
gt <- gtable_add_padding(gt, padding=unit(1,"line"))
grid.draw(gt)
If you want to build everything from scratch, here too you'll end up having to reinvent a good portion of gtable, I reckon.