Draw on screen border in Commodore 64

I have this curiosity for 25 years and I would love to understand the trick.

In the Commodore 64 the border was not addressable by the 6569 VIC. All you could do was to draw pixels in the central area, the one where the cursor moved. The border was always uniform, although you could change its color with poke 53280,color if i remember correctly.

Nevertheless I clearly remember games intros where the border was featured with graphics, like it was fully addressable. I tried to understand how it worked but never got to the point. legends say it was a clever use of sprites, which could, under some circumstances, be drawn on the border, but I don't know if it's an urban legend.

edit: just read this from one of the provided links

Sprites were multiplexed across vertical raster lines (over 8 sprites, sometimes up to 120 sprites). Until the Group Crest released Krestage 3 in May 2007 there was the common perception that no more than 8 sprites could appear at one raster line, but assigning new Y coordinates made it reappear further down the screen.

This is evil.... you beat the raster and reposition the sprite before it gets there...


  • Firstly only sprites can be displayed in the border area or a repeating 8 bit pattern (8 pixels wide) which is read from the last byte of the video bank, usually $3fff. Note you can only see these sprites or 8 bit pattern when you trick the VIC chip into "not displaying" the borders. See below.

    The borders have a higher priority than sprites, so normally when a sprite is drawn in a border area the border covers the sprite. With a bit of VIC chip trickery you can turn the borders off.

    You can turn the top and bottom borders off quite easily (I'll explain below), and the side borders off with very critical timing.

    Firstly a little bit of info on how the VIC chip works on a c64.

    The VIC chip draws the screen from the top left to the top right, then down a line, and from left to right again until the entire screen is drawn. It performs this redraw 50 times a second (for PAL units) or 60 times a second for (NTSC units).

    There is an 8-bit VIC register that contains the vertical position of the raster at any given time. $d012. Actually there are more than 255 possible positions, so the 9th bit is stored in bit 7 (highest bit) or register $d011. So at any point you can read these registers and find out the vertical position of the raster. There is no available register to read the x position of the raster.

    Another cool feature of the VIC chip was used to fix a problem when using hardware scrolling. Basic vertical scrolling was achieved by using a hardware register to move the screen 0-7 pixels vertically. Once you reached limit (0 or 7 depending on the direction of the scroll) you would move each character block (8x8 pixel) one block vertically and draw the new data to be displayed at the top (or bottom depending direction). This works very well, except that every 8 pixels of scrolling you would see data "pop" onto the screen. To remedy this, you could make the border area grow by 8 pixels vertically by clearing bit 3 in register $d011. This is called 24 row mode. By default the screen was set to 25 rows of 8x8 pixel characters. In 24 row mode, you could still draw characters to the bottom row, they would just be hidden by the border.

    So the trick to turning off the top and bottom borders is to:

    1) Set the screen to 25 row mode

    2) wait for the raster to reach a vertical position between $f2 and $fa (the 8 pixels between where the border starts in both 24 row mode and 25 row mode).

    3) Set the screen to 24 row mode... moving the vertical start of the border above the current raster position

    4) Wait until after vertical raster position ($fa)

    5) Repeat each frame

    Step 3) tricks the VIC chip into thinking that it has already started drawing the border, so it never starts drawing it. Voila, the top and bottom borders are open.

    Regarding side borders you can do the same thing with different registers, but as the horizontal movement of the raster is a lot quicker than the vertical movement, the timing needs to be much tighter. And there is another issue to take into account called jitter. <-which I won't explain here. Search the web for "Stable Raster C64" for an in depth explanation of that issue.