I wanted have implicit conversion in two level. The following code snippet is prototype of the problem I am facing.
//Sources
class A
{
public:
void print()
{
std::cout <<"Class A"<< std::endl;
}
operator int()
{
return 1;
}
};
class B
{
public:
void print()
{
std::cout <<"Class B"<< std::endl;
}
operator A()
{
return A();
}
};
class C
{
public:
void print()
{
std::cout <<"Class C"<< std::endl;
}
operator B()
{
return B();
}
};
void print_(A a)
{
a.print();
}
//driver
int main( int argc, char* argv[] )
{
C c;
//print_( c ); // compilation error
//print_( C() ); // compilation error
print_( c.operator framework::configuration::B() ); //when explicitly invoked it worked
return 0;
}
I looked into the example provided in the following links was convinced this is achievable.
The standard only allows one implicit conversion involving a user defined type. You have two, hence the compilation error.
See 12.3/4
At most one user-defined conversion (constructor or conversion function) is implicitly applied to a single value.