As illustrated in the code below, why can't I use __setattr__
to set values on a dict that is part of the class that overloads the method? I expected that b.hello
would not exist.
class MyClass():
datastore = {}
def __init__(self):
self.datastore = {}
def __getattr__(self, key):
return self.datastore[key]
def __setattr__(self, key, value):
self.datastore[key] = value
a = MyClass()
b = MyClass()
a.hello = "err"
print a.hello # err
print b.hello # err
b.hello
prints your string "err" because datastore
is an attribute of the class itself, not of objects of the class. Therefore, when you initialize it in a
, b
can also access it.
Therefore, remove the datastore = {}
from the class.
Furthermore, from the Python docs:
if
__setattr__()
wants to assign to an instance attribute, it should not simply executeself.name = value
— this would cause a recursive call to itself. Instead, it should insert the value in the dictionary of instance attributes, e.g.,self.__dict__[name] = value
. For new-style classes, rather than accessing the instance dictionary, it should call the base class method with the same name, for example,object.__setattr__(self, name, value)
.
So, change your code to:
class MyClass(object): # Use new style classes
def __init__(self):
object.__setattr__(self, 'datastore', {}) # This prevents infinite recursion when setting attributes
def __getattr__(self, key):
return self.datastore[key]
def __setattr__(self, key, value):
self.datastore[key] = value
a = MyClass()
b = MyClass()
a.hello = "err"
print a.hello # Works
print b.hello # Gives an error