My goal is to create an object to allow chaining of commands in MVC.Net views.
Here is an example use in a view of a menu I created using this concept:
<nav class="navigation">
<%: Html
.menu()
.item("Introduction", "Introduction", "Home")
.item("About", "About", "Home")
.item("Systems", "Index", "Systems")
/*.item("Categories", "Categories", "Health")*/
.item("Test Cases", "TestCases", "Testing")
.category("Logging")
.item("UniMon Events", "UniMonEvents", "Logging")
.end()
.end() %>
</nav>
As you can see it allows for the quick construction of a multi-tiered menu with interdependencies between the various parts.
I would like to achieve this same effect for a form using lambda expressions.
The ideal syntax would look like this:
<%: Html
.form()
.hidden(m=>m.property1)
.hidden(m=>m.property2)
.end() %>
Where I am running into trouble is with the hidden method. It seems there is no way to get the compiler to infer m without passing it to the method hidden.
I can achieve this syntax:
<%: Html
.form()
.hidden(Html, m=>m.property1)
.hidden(Html, m=>m.property2)
.end() %>
Using this class and an extension method(not shown):
public class RouteForm
{
public HtmlHelper HtmlHelper { get; private set; }
public Dictionary<string, string> PostData { get; private set; }
public RouteForm(HtmlHelper htmlHelper)
{
HtmlHelper = htmlHelper;
PostData = new Dictionary<string, string>();
}
public RouteForm hidden<TModel, TValue>(HtmlHelper<TModel> htmlHelper, Expression<Func<TModel, TValue>> expression)
{
string name = ExpressionHelper.GetExpressionText(expression);
string value = GetFieldValue(htmlHelper, expression);
PostData.Add(name, value);
return this;
}
private static string GetFieldValue<TModel, TValue>(HtmlHelper<TModel> htmlHelper, Expression<Func<TModel, TValue>> expression)
{
object oValue = expression.Compile()(htmlHelper.ViewData.Model);
string value = (oValue is Enum) ? ((int)oValue).ToString() : oValue.ToString();
return value; ;
}
public MvcHtmlString end()
{
//TODO: render form with post data
return MvcHtmlString.Empty;
}
}
I thought that perhaps a class with a generic type might be what I am looking for, so I tried this:
public class RouteForm<TModel>
{
public HtmlHelper<TModel> HtmlHelper { get; private set; }
public Dictionary<string, string> PostData { get; private set; }
public RouteForm(HtmlHelper<TModel> htmlHelper)
{
HtmlHelper = htmlHelper;
PostData = new Dictionary<string, string>();
}
public RouteForm<TModel> hidden<TModel, TValue>(Expression<Func<TModel, TValue>> expression)
{
string name = ExpressionHelper.GetExpressionText(expression);
string value = GetFieldValue(expression);
PostData.Add(name, value);
return this;//ERRORS: TModel is TModel
}
private string GetFieldValue<TModel, TValue>(Expression<Func<TModel, TValue>> expression)
{
object oValue = expression.Compile()(
(TModel)HtmlHelper.ViewData.Model //ERRORS: Cannot convert type TModel to TModel
);
string value = (oValue is Enum) ? ((int)oValue).ToString() : oValue.ToString();
return value; ;
}
public MvcHtmlString end()
{
//TODO: render form with post data
return MvcHtmlString.Empty;
}
}
I put the errors in the code above using comments.
Thanks!
You're using too many generic parameters.
Methods like GetFieldValue<TModel, ...>
create a second TModel
paramter which is not related to the first one.
In other words, they allow you to write
new RouteForm<PersonModel>().GetFieldValue<TruckModel, ...>()
This is obviously wrong.
Instead, just get rid of that parameter from each method and let them use the class' TModel
parameter instead.