I understand the difference between copy
vs. deepcopy
in the copy module. I've used copy.copy
and copy.deepcopy
before successfully, but this is the first time I've actually gone about overloading the __copy__
and __deepcopy__
methods. I've already Googled around and looked through the built-in Python modules to look for instances of the __copy__
and __deepcopy__
functions (e.g. sets.py
, decimal.py
, and fractions.py
), but I'm still not 100% sure I've got it right.
Here's my scenario:
I have a configuration object. Initially, I'm going to instantiate one configuration object with a default set of values. This configuration will be handed off to multiple other objects (to ensure all objects start with the same configuration). However, once user interaction starts, each object needs to tweak its configurations independently without affecting each other's configurations (which says to me I'll need to make deepcopys of my initial configuration to hand around).
Here's a sample object:
class ChartConfig(object):
def __init__(self):
#Drawing properties (Booleans/strings)
self.antialiased = None
self.plot_style = None
self.plot_title = None
self.autoscale = None
#X axis properties (strings/ints)
self.xaxis_title = None
self.xaxis_tick_rotation = None
self.xaxis_tick_align = None
#Y axis properties (strings/ints)
self.yaxis_title = None
self.yaxis_tick_rotation = None
self.yaxis_tick_align = None
#A list of non-primitive objects
self.trace_configs = []
def __copy__(self):
pass
def __deepcopy__(self, memo):
pass
What is the right way to implement the copy
and deepcopy
methods on this object to ensure copy.copy
and copy.deepcopy
give me the proper behavior?
The recommendations for customizing are at the very end of the docs page:
Classes can use the same interfaces to control copying that they use to control pickling. See the description of module pickle for information on these methods. The copy module does not use the copy_reg registration module.
In order for a class to define its own copy implementation, it can define special methods
__copy__()
and__deepcopy__()
. The former is called to implement the shallow copy operation; no additional arguments are passed. The latter is called to implement the deep copy operation; it is passed one argument, the memo dictionary. If the__deepcopy__()
implementation needs to make a deep copy of a component, it should call thedeepcopy()
function with the component as first argument and the memo dictionary as second argument.
Since you appear not to care about pickling customization, defining __copy__
and __deepcopy__
definitely seems like the right way to go for you.
Specifically, __copy__
(the shallow copy) is pretty easy in your case...:
def __copy__(self):
newone = type(self)()
newone.__dict__.update(self.__dict__)
return newone
__deepcopy__
would be similar (accepting a memo
arg too) but before the return it would have to call self.foo = deepcopy(self.foo, memo)
for any attribute self.foo
that needs deep copying (essentially attributes that are containers -- lists, dicts, non-primitive objects which hold other stuff through their __dict__
s).