I am trying to improve my C++ by creating a program that will take a large amount of numbers between 1 and 10^6. The buckets that will store the numbers in each pass is an array of nodes (where node is a struct I created containing a value and a next node attribute).
After sorting the numbers into buckets according to the least significant value, I have the end of one bucket point to the beginning of another bucket (so that I can quickly get the numbers being stored without disrupting the order). My code has no errors (either compile or runtime), but I've hit a wall regarding how I am going to solve the remaining 6 iterations (since I know the range of numbers).
The problem that I'm having is that initially the numbers were supplied to the radixSort function in the form of a int array. After the first iteration of the sorting, the numbers are now stored in the array of structs. Is there any way that I could rework my code so that I have just one for loop for the 7 iterations, or will I need one for loop that will run once, and another loop below it that will run 6 times before returning the completely sorted list?
#include <iostream>
#include <math.h>
using namespace std;
struct node
{
int value;
node *next;
};
//The 10 buckets to store the intermediary results of every sort
node *bucket[10];
//This serves as the array of pointers to the front of every linked list
node *ptr[10];
//This serves as the array of pointer to the end of every linked list
node *end[10];
node *linkedpointer;
node *item;
node *temp;
void append(int value, int n)
{
node *temp;
item=new node;
item->value=value;
item->next=NULL;
end[n]=item;
if(bucket[n]->next==NULL)
{
cout << "Bucket " << n << " is empty" <<endl;
bucket[n]->next=item;
ptr[n]=item;
}
else
{
cout << "Bucket " << n << " is not empty" <<endl;
temp=bucket[n];
while(temp->next!=NULL){
temp=temp->next;
}
temp->next=item;
}
}
bool isBucketEmpty(int n){
if(bucket[n]->next!=NULL)
return false;
else
return true;
}
//print the contents of all buckets in order
void printBucket(){
temp=bucket[0]->next;
int i=0;
while(i<10){
if(temp==NULL){
i++;
temp=bucket[i]->next;
}
else break;
}
linkedpointer=temp;
while(temp!=NULL){
cout << temp->value <<endl;
temp=temp->next;
}
}
void radixSort(int *list, int length){
int i,j,k,l;
int x;
for(i=0;i<10;i++){
bucket[i]=new node;
ptr[i]=new node;
ptr[i]->next=NULL;
end[i]=new node;
}
linkedpointer=new node;
//Perform radix sort
for(i=0;i<1;i++){
for(j=0;j<length;j++){
x=(int)(*(list+j)/pow(10,i))%10;
append(*(list+j),x);
printBucket(x);
}//End of insertion loop
k=0,l=1;
//Linking loop: Link end of one linked list to the front of another
for(j=0;j<9;j++){
if(isBucketEmpty(k))
k++;
if(isBucketEmpty(l) && l!=9)
l++;
if(!isBucketEmpty(k) && !isBucketEmpty(l)){
end[k]->next=ptr[l];
k++;
if(l!=9) l++;
}
}//End of linking for loop
cout << "Print results" <<endl;
printBucket();
for(j=0;j<10;j++)
bucket[i]->next=NULL;
cout << "End of iteration" <<endl;
}//End of radix sort loop
}
int main(){
int testcases,i,input;
cin >> testcases;
int list[testcases];
int *ptr=&list[0];
for(i=0;i<testcases;i++){
cin>>list[i];
}
radixSort(ptr,testcases);
return 0;
}
I think you're severely overcomplicating your solution. You can implement radix using the single array received in the input, with the buckets in each step represented by an array of indices that mark the starting index of each bucket in the input array.
In fact, you could even do it recursively:
// Sort 'size' number of integers starting at 'input' according to the 'digit'th digit
// For the parameter 'digit', 0 denotes the least significant digit and increases as significance does
void radixSort(int* input, int size, int digit)
{
if (size == 0)
return;
int[10] buckets; // assuming decimal numbers
// Sort the array in place while keeping track of bucket starting indices.
// If bucket[i] is meant to be empty (no numbers with i at the specified digit),
// then let bucket[i+1] = bucket[i]
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
{
radixSort(input + buckets[i], buckets[i+1] - buckets[i], digit+1);
}
}
Of course buckets[i+1] - buckets[i] will cause a buffer overflow when i is 9, but I omitted the extra check or readability's sake; I trust you know how to handle that.
With that, you just have to call radixSort(testcases, sizeof(testcases) / sizeof(testcases[0]), 0) and your array should be sorted.