This is odd. I have a website running under a .Net 2.0 app pool (Integrated mode) and couldn't connect to a WCF service on the site. A message reading "The requested content appears to be script and will not be served by the static file handler" would pop up whenever I navigated to the URL on my box.
I checked the handler mappings in IIS for this website's .svc extension and saw entries reading svc-Integrated-4.0, svc-ISAPI-2.0- and svc-ISAPI-2.0-64. But nothing for svc-Integrated, which I assume was the problem.
I followed the ServiceModelReg -i recommendations in this post, but there was no instance of that executible in my Framework\v2.0.5027 subfolder. So I went up a level and found it in my Framework\3.0.0 folder, and ran it from there. Lo and behold, things work now and there's a new handler for svc-Integrated in the mappings section.
But my question is: if I installed this for .Net 3.0, how is a .Net 2.0 app pool making use of it? I thought there would be a compatibility issue?
I installed this for .Net 3.0, how is a .Net 2.0 app pool making use of it? I thought there would be a compatibility issue?
No, the .NET Framework 3.0 still uses the 2.0 CLR, so using a 2.0 AppPool is appropriate.
IIS AppPools indicate the CLR version, not the Framework version.