I currently have a piece of code that I am working on using function pointers as callbacks. I am having trouble with an error from gcc stating "storage class specified for parameter `type name'" The relevant portion of code is:
error_t addCommand(uint8_t command, void (*callback)(uint16_t,uint8_t)){
This is actually using the nesC language for TinyOS but it seems to be a C issue. In my research on the issue I have found suggestions mostly stemming from one of two issues:
void (*callback)(volatile int, uint8_t)I have eliminated problem 1 as far as I can tell. Problem 2 is only an issue if uint16_t or uint8_t are static of volatile (I don't have much experience with these types). Any tips/answers on how to solve this issue are greatly appreciated.
Also, if anyone is familiar with nesC the exact code looks more like this:
command error_t CommandEngine.addCommand(uint8_t command,
void (*callback)(uint16_t,uint8_t)) {
It may be possible that what nesC is adding to the C language causes this error but I don't think this is the case.
EDIT: It was nesC, in a way. It turns out that I'm a moron and was using command as a variable name when command is used by nesC and converted to some block of C code before compilation. Thanks everyone for the idea of converting it to C code as this caused me to realize the issue. I really should have thought of this.
It's generally good to use typedefs for function pointers. It may solve your problem, and will surely be much more readable:
typedef void (*callback_t)(uint16_t,uint8_t);
error_t addCommand(uint8_t command, callback_t callback)){
If it won't solve the problem, it will at least narrow it down - you'll see if the problem is with the typedef or the function.
You should also try to figure out if it's nesC (which I know nothing about) or C. Try to remove nesC specific parts and compile with gcc, and see what happens.